民事訴訟中的舉證責(zé)任分配.pdf

1、貴州大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文民事訴訟中的舉證責(zé)任分配姓名：金橋申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：法律民事訴訟法指導(dǎo)教師：李衛(wèi)國(guó)20071001ThereponsibilityallotmentresP0nslblmenttya上●CaSe1ncourtofofferSummaryIntheCivi1asproofTheburdenofproofinalltheprocedureisthesame。Itallocatetheresponsibilityto

2、oneside，ifonecan’tafford，thecourtwillhaveaoppositeviewandgiveaadversejudge。Inviewofthemethodology，theofferasproofofthepertainingtocrimenalprocedureresponsibilityproblemandcivilcaseincourtshaveverygreatlydistinct，comparew

3、iththecivilprocedure，thepertainingtocrime1itigationsetsoutfromthepositionofthehumanitarianismandhumannature，willoffertheresponsibilitytogivetotheaccausetoundertake”absolutely”Sincethismeaning，thecivilprocedurestillkeptth

4、eoriginalappearance，ithadbeencontinuethe”theplaintiffshouldundertaketheresponsibilityofproving”ofthemethodestablishmentandtheprincipleof”vocatorhasthedutytoprove，denierhasn’t“whichareofancientRomeButfromthe50’Sin20centur

5、ies，theallotmenttheoriesthatoffersasprooftheresponsibilityalsoproducedthegravenessvarietywiththedevelopmentoftheagesTheburdenofproofinthecivilcaseincourtincludetwomeaningsonthecontent：Thefirst，whoshouldundertaketoofferth

6、eprovingresponsibility，thenburdenasproofthecorpusofresponsibilityisaplaintiffasquareoranaccused，orsayiSaffirmativeornegationHowtoanswerthisquestion，willformthetheoryofpincpleofallocation：Thesecond，howtoburdeningtheproof，

7、inwhichscopesanddegree，whichiSneedtobeprovedwhichiSnot，infactthequalityisanalIotmentstandardthatoffersasprooftheresponsibilityBecauseofferingasproofisacomplexityproblem，dependingononlyacertaintheoryiStoodifficultItshould

8、synthesizevarioustheory，absorbfromiteachfromreasonablefactor，abstractamongthemsomecommonprinciple，tallyupastandardofallotment，inordertousedforguidingthejudicatoryfulfilimentKeywords：civi1procedure，burdenofproof，allocatio