近代價(jià)值觀轉(zhuǎn)變中的梁?jiǎn)⒊瑯?lè)利學(xué)說(shuō).pdf

1、華東師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文近代價(jià)值觀轉(zhuǎn)變中的梁?jiǎn)⒊瑯?lè)利學(xué)說(shuō)姓名：王濤申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：中國(guó)哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：高瑞泉20100501ABSTRACTThereformationofvaluesfromthetheoryofvirtuetoutilitarianismexistedinmodernChinaThispapertriestoexplainhowdidLiangQichaotransformthetheoryofvirtuein

2、toonekindofutilitarianismwhichnamedthetheoryofpleasureandinterest(Leli】duringthereformationofvaluesImaintainthatLiangQichaoimplementedthistransformationmainlybycriticizingthetheoryofvirtueofZhuXionthebasisofabsorbingwest

3、ernandtraditionalcultureresources，ofcourse，thetheoryofpleasureandinterest(Leli)retainedsomeideaofthetheoryofvirtueThefirstpartofthispaperdiscussesthatLiangQichaocriticizedtheideaofheavenandmanofZhuXi，andhowdidLiangQichao

4、demonstratethattheideaofrighteousnessandprofitablenessneednotbefoundedonthebasisoftheideaofheavenandmanThesecondpartofthispaperdiscussesthathowdidthetheoryofPleasureandInterest(Leli)improvetheconceptionof“profitableness”

5、againsttheideaofrighteousnessandprOftabIeneSSofZhuXiduringthereformationofvaluesThethirdpartanalyzeshowdidLiangQichaocriticizetheideaof“keepthecelestiallawexistencekilloffthehumandesire”ofZhuXiandprovethelegalityofdesire

6、ThefourthpartillustratesLiangQichaocriticizedZhuXihadneglectedindividualprofitablenessandconfirmedthevalueofindividualproflfabIenessfrOmseveralanglesThefifthpartanalyzesthedifferencesandsimilaritieson“publicproftabIeness

7、”ofZhuXiandLiangQichao，andintroducestheideaofpublicproftabIeneSSofLiangQichaofullyThelastpartpointsoutthattherearesomesimilaritiesbetweenZhuXiandLiangQichaoThetheoryofPleasureandInterest(LeliJwhichformedduringthereformat

8、ionofvaluesisoneofimportantpartin毗andholdsthefeaturesoftThecorrectionmadebytheoryofpleasureandinterest(LeliJtothetheoryofvirtuemakesthedebateonrighteousnessandprofitablenessmoredeeplytheoretically，atalsomeettherequiremen