簡介：湘潭大學碩士學位論文張栻哲學思想研究姓名王麗梅申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)中國哲學指導(dǎo)教師趙載光20010501ABSTRACTZHANGSHIWASAFAMOUSPHILOSOPHEROFSONGDYNASTY,ANDWASWELLREPUTEDTOGETHERWITHZHUXIANDLUZUQIANAS“THREEPERSONSOFVIRTUEINSOUTHEASTCHINA”．HEWASALSOONEOFIMPORTANTREPRESENTATIVEFIGURESOFHUXIANGSCH001．INSPITEOFTHESETHERESEARCHV，ORKRELATEDTOHISTHOUGHTISSELDOMSEENANDEVERIGNOREDINPRESENTACADEMICCIRCLES．ITWASONLYIN80’STHATITHADBEENOCCASIONALLYRESEARCHED．BUTWITHOUTBEINGPAIDGREATATTENTIONORBEINGFURTHERRESEARCHED．INFACTZHANGSHI’STHOUGHTISABUNDANT．HISKNOWLEDGE，HASGREATLYINFLUENCEDONTHESCHOLARSOFHISTIME．ESPECIALLYONZHUXI．THATZHUXICOULDBECOMEANIMPORTANTANDFAMOUSPHILOSOPHICALSCHOLARCAN’TBESEPARATEDWITHTHEFACTTHATHEWASCLOSELYCONNECTEDWITHZHANGSHIANDFREQUENTLYEXCHANGEDTHEIRACADEMICTHOUGHTS．WECANSAYTHATWITHOUTZHANGSHI，ZHUXICOULDNOTACHIEVESOMUCHORBESOFAMOUS．JUST1EDBVZHANGSI．HUXIANGSCHOOLHADBECOMETHEBIGGESTANDMOSTPROSPEROUSACADEMICGROUPATTHATTIME．TILLTODANWECANSTILLSEEANDFEELTHEVIGORANDSTUDYINGSTYLEOFHUXIANGSCH001．BYANALYZINGTHEONTOLOGY,INTROSPECTIONTHEORY,HUMANNATURETHEORY,KNOWINGANDDOINGTHEORY,ETC．OFZHANGSHI’SPHILOSOPHICALTHOUGHT．THEAUTHOR,INTHISARTICLE．THINKTHETHOUGHTOFZHANGSHIDI儂RSFROMNOTONLYZHUXI’SLIONTOLOGYBUTALSOLUXIANGSHAHXINONTOLOGY．ONTHEBASISOFINHERITINGFORMERWORTHIES’THOUGHT，ZHANGSHICONSTRUCTEDHISDISTINCTIVETAIJIONTOLOGY．INTHEAUTHOR’SOPINION，ZHANGSHIDEVOTEDUNIQUELYTOTHEDEVELOPMENTOFPHILOSOPHYOFSONYDYNASTYANDTHEHISTORYOFCHINESETHOUGHT．HISTHOUGHTISALLINEVITABLEIINKOFTHATWITHPOSSESSIONOFHISTORICALPLACE．KEYWORDSTAIJIONTOLOGYKEEPINGINTROSPECTIONANDTAKINGONEGOODNATUREVIEWOFJUSTICANDGAININTERCOURSEOFKNOWINGANDDOINGJINGSHIZHIYONG

簡介：分類號密級單位代碼10422學號蒙力番SHANDONGUNIVERSTTY碩士學位論文論文題目THESISFORMASTERDEGREE作者姓名培養(yǎng)單位專業(yè)名稱指導(dǎo)教師合作導(dǎo)師年月日，∥山東大學碩士學位論文目錄中支摘要???????????????????????????????????????．1ABSTRACT?????????????????????????????????????．2綜述????????????????????????????????????????．．4一、張爾岐哲學思想的研究意義????????????????????4二、張爾岐學術(shù)的研究現(xiàn)狀??????????????????????5第一章張爾岐思想的背景???????????????????????8一、時局變化與學術(shù)背景???????????????????????8二、論學旨意???????????????????????????．12三、治學方法???????????????????????????．15第二章氣生萬物的本體論??????????????????????．他一、氣生萬物???????????????????????????．18二、氣本理末???????????????????????????．20第三章天道即自然的天道觀?????????????????????．22一、天人相及以其氣????????????????????????．22二、因勢所至，歸之自然??????????????????????．24三、存乎天于可知與不可知之間???????????????????．27第四章以誠立命、以義安命的工夫論??????????????????．∞一、性與命皆由乎氣????????????????????????．30二、以誠立命、以義安命??????????????????????．31三、中庸即禮，六經(jīng)皆禮?????????????????????34第五章張爾岐在中國哲學史上的地位?????????????????。37一、氣本論的重振?????????????????????????．37二、天道觀的創(chuàng)新?????????????????????????．40三、張爾岐禮學研究的影響?????????????????????．42結(jié)語??????????????????????????????．¨參考文獻??????????????????????????????．帖致謝???????????????????????????????．船

簡介：分類號B2235單位代碼10346密級公開學號2012110332碩士學位論文中文論文題目中文論文題目莊子的自然世界及其生態(tài)哲學意蘊莊子的自然世界及其生態(tài)哲學意蘊英文論文題目英文論文題目CHUANGTZU’SNATURALWORLDANDITSECOLOGICALPHILOSOPHYIMPLICATION申請人姓名徐靜芝指導(dǎo)教師朱曉鵬專業(yè)名稱中國哲學研究方向道家哲學研究所在學院政治與社會學院論文提交日期論文提交日期2015年5月杭州師范大學研究生學位論文獨創(chuàng)性聲明本人聲明所呈交的學位論文是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下進行的研究工作及取得的研究成果。除了文中特別加以標注和致謝的地方外，論文中不包含其他人已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的研究成果，也不包含為獲得杭州師范大學杭州師范大學或其他教育機構(gòu)的學位或證書而使用過的材料。與我一同工作的同志對本研究所做的任何貢獻均已在論文中作了明確的說明并表示謝意。學位論文作者簽名簽字日期年月日學位論文版權(quán)使用授權(quán)書本學位論文作者完全了解杭州師范大學杭州師范大學有權(quán)保留并向國家有關(guān)部門或機構(gòu)送交本論文的復(fù)印件和磁盤，允許論文被查閱和借閱。本人授權(quán)杭州師杭州師范大學范大學可以將學位論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫進行檢索和傳播，可以采用影印、縮印或掃描等復(fù)制手段保存、匯編學位論文。（保密的學位論文在解密后適用本授權(quán)書）學位論文作者簽名導(dǎo)師簽名簽字日期年月日簽字日期年月日

簡介：遼寧師范大學碩士學位論文莊子的人生哲學姓名黃燁申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)中國古代文學指導(dǎo)教師邊家珍20070510ABSTRACTCONTENTZHUANGZI’STHOUGHTPRODUCESATMORETHAN2，000YEARAGOTHEWARRINGSTATESPEDODS。FINALLY,THEHEDISCUSSIONOFTHEUNIVERSENATURE、SOCIALLIFEANDSOONINTHEBOOKOFZHUANGZIFALLSTHEFOOTONTHELIFC．SOTHESTUDYOFZHUANGZIISTHESTUDYOFPHILOSOPHYOFLIFEINFACT．THEREARESOMANYRESEARCHESONZHUANGZIDURINGTHE2，000YEARS．ZHUANGZISPHILOSOPHYOFLIREAFFECTSONTHECHINESELITERATIANDSCHOLARBUREAUCRAISALLPREVIOUSDYNASTIESFROMDIFFERENTDEGREESANDALLGLES．THISPAPERUTILIZESTHERESEARCHTECHNIQUEOFTHELITERATUREMETHODOIOGY。THEHISTORYANDTHE109ICALANALYTICMETHOD，THELONGITUDINALINSPECTIONANDTHECROSSWISECOMPARISONUNIFIEDANDSOONTODISCUSSESZHUANGZI’SPHILOSOPHYOFLIFE．FIRST,COLLECTANDHOLDTHECORRELATIONMATERIAL，ANDDIGESTANDABSORBTHEM，THENCOMBTHEFOUNDATIONWHICHISZHUANGZI’SPHILOSOPHYOFLIRE．ITCONTAINSTHESOCIALHISTORYROOTOFZHUANGZI’SPHILOSOPHYOFLIFE，THEPREDECESSORTHOUGHTINFLUENCO,ZHUANGZI’STHOUGHTOFNATURALVIEW，ZHUANGZISTHOUGHTOFDISCUSSIONONMAKINGALLTHINGSEQUALASWELLASALLSORTSOFCONTRADICTIONSOFREALLIFEWHICHZHUANGZIUNFOLDSFORPEOPLE．SECOND，USINGTHEHISTORICALSUMMARYLAW，SUMMARYZHUANGZI’SPHILOSOPHYOFLIFC，ANDUSING109ICALANALYTICMETHODOFINDUCTIONSYNTHESIS、COMPARATIVEANALYSIS，ABSTRACTSUMMARYANDSO0NTOMAKEITINTOTHTOGLEVELS．11LEFIRSTLEVELOFZHUANGZI’SPHILOSOPHYOFLIREISTHATTEACHTHEPEOPLEHOWTOSURVIVEWHENTHEYFACETHETUMULTUOUSTIMES．INTHEPEACEFULLIFEFOUNDATION，REALIZESITSLIFEIDEALPURSUETHE印IRITTOBEABSOLUTELYFREE．NAMELYTHEFREEANDUNFENERED’THISJSTHESECONDLEVEL．ZHUANGZISLIFEIDEALISREALIZEDBYTHEIDEALPERSONALITYPERFECTHUMAN“、“GODMAN”、“WISEMALL”、“TRUEM蜘”ANDSOOILINHISARTICLE．THE∞FEOFTHEFREEANDUNFETTEREDISERADICATINGTHEFETTER,NOTSERVINGFORTHETHINGSANDSURMOUNTINGALLTHEDIFFERENTPOSITIONINTHEWORD，THENONECANGCT【BEPERSONALITYINDEPENDENCECOMPLETELYANDTHEFREEOFSPIRITABSOLUTELY．HOWEVER,ZHUANGZI’SPHILOSOPHYOFLIFEDIDN’TSTOPATTHEFREEOFGIVINGUPALLRESPONSIBILITIESANDTHEPURSUED．AFTERPROMULGATESTHEPAINOFALLTHESORTSOFDIFFJCULTPOSITIONSOFTHEREALLIRE，ITPURSUESHOWTOSOLVEALLSORTSOFCONTRADICTINNSOFREAIIIRE．HOWTOEXPLORETHENEWWAYOFLIFE．SOITISTHETHIRDLEVELOFZHUANGZI’SPHILOSOPHYOFLIRERETURNNATURE．PURSUESTHEPLACEOFTHESTABLESURVIVALINTHEHARMONYBETWEENTHEPERSONANDTHENATURE，SEEKTHENEWSIGNIFICANCEOFTHELIRE，REALIZETHEVALUEOFLIVINGTHINGSANDLIFC．ATLAST,PUTZHUANGZISPHILOSOPHYOF1IFCINTHECHAINOFHISTORYSTUDY,DISCUSSTHEINFLUENCETOTHECHINESECLASSICALLITERATUREFROMTHEFACETOFNIHILITYFECLINGANDCRITICALSPIRIT；ATTHESAMETIME，MAKEASTATICCONTRASTANALYSISWITHTHEPRE．QINOTHERSCHOOLSOFTHOUGHTSASWELLASTHEFREETHOUGHTSOFWESTERLL．REALIZINGTHEGREATRENAISSANCEOFCHINA，PROPOSINGHARMONIOUSDEVELOPMENTOFSOCIETY．ANDEXCLAIMINGPHILOSOPHYOFLIRERESTRUCTURE，ANDITSNODOUBTTHATTHETRADITIONALPHILOSOPHYISTHEROOTOFWISDOMINREBUILDINGTHEPHILOSOPHYOFIIRE。UNDERTHENEWHISTORICALCONDITION，WESHOULDANALYZE、INTROSPECTANDFORSAKETHEPHILOSOPHYOFZHUANGZIINTHEROUND，MAKEITBRINGACTIVEFUNCTIONINPERFECTINGONE’SPERSONALITY，INOPTIMIZINGETHOS．ANDINDEVELOPINGHARMONIOUSSOCIETY．WESHOULDMAKEITBECOMEAPARTOFMODEMPHILOSOPHYOFLIRE．THATISJUSTTHEVALUEOFTHEPAPER．

簡介：湘潭大學碩士學位論文張君勱哲學與政治之間姓名歐陽詢申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)中國哲學指導(dǎo)教師劉啟良20070501IIABSTRACTCENTERINGONTHEQUESTIONOFHOWCHINAREALIZESMODERNIZATION,THREEPOLITICALCULTURALIDEOLOGICALTRENDSINCLUDINGCONSERVATISM,LIBERALISM,ANDRADICALDOCTRINEHAVEAPPEAREDATTHESAMETIMENEARLYASMAINREPRESENTATIVEINCONSERVATISM,THEMODERNNEWCONFUCIANISTSOBJECTTOBOTHTHERADICALANDSTICKINGTOTHEESTABLISHEDPRACTICE,BUTTAKETHEATTITUDEOF“PRACTICALINNOVATION“INTHISWAY,THEYSTANDFASTATTHECONFUCIAN’SSTUDYINDISPOSITIONJUSTICEATNARROWLYDEFINEDIDEACULTUREIETHEOUTLOOKONLIFE,STUDYANDDRAWLESSONSFROMTHEMODERNWESTERNDEMOCRATICSYSTEMPOLITICALLY,ANDREGARDDEMOCRACYASINHERENTREQUIREMENTANDRESULTOFDIALECTICALDEVELOPMENTOFDISPOSITIONJUSTICEITSAPITYTHATTHEYHAVENOTREALIZEDSTUDYINDISPOSITIONJUSTICEANDPOLITICALLIBERALISMHASBEENOPPOSITEESSENTIALLYDISPOSITIONJUSTICEISNOTTHEBASICPOINTTOSETUPDEMOCRACYTHESOCIALDEVELOPMENTFACTINDICATESTHATTHETRADITIONALOUTLOOKONLIFEHASALREADYBEENINCOMPATIBLEWITHCURRENTERA,ANDISDETESTEDANDREJECTEDDEEPLYBYTHEMASSESOFPEOPLETHEDEMOCRATICAUTOCRACYWITHITSLOOKSFORMHASALSOPASSEDTHROUGHMANYHANDSORPLACESWITHTHEADVANCEDHISTORYWHEELATTHESAMETIME,THESCHOOLOFMODERNNEWCONFUCIANTHATADVOCATE“HOLYINSIDEOPENSNEWKINGOUTSIDE“,HASSTRUGGLEDFORTHERIGHTSTOSUBSISTENCEEARNESTLYALLTHETIMEITSUTOPIAOFMORALSISSOFARSTILLLIKETHEMOONINWATERANDFLOWERINMIRRORINADDITION,ACCORDINGTOTHESITUATIONTHATTHEYTHROWTHEMSELVESINTOTHEPOLITICALACTIVITY,THEY’REEITHERNOTTOBEMERGEDINTOBECAUSEOFHIGHJUSTICE,FORINSTANCEXIONGSHILI,ETALORBOOSTAUTOCRATICDICTATORSHIPREGIMESARROGANCEBECAUSEOFTHEWRONGTHEORY’SGUIDANCE,FORINSTANCEZHANGJUNMAIPARTICIPATEDIN“THEFALSENATIONALASSEMBLY“,ETCIN1946AMONGTHEMODERNNEWPERSONAGESOFTHECONFUCIANISTS,ZHANGJUNMAICANCALLMODELOF“NOTFORGETPOLITICSBECAUSEOFPHILOSOPHY,NOTFORGETPHILOSOPHYBECAUSEOFPOLITICS“BECAUSEHISCOREOFPHILOSOPHYTHOUGHTISTHEOUTLOOKONLIFEOFTHEFREEWILL,IETHECONFUCIANISTS’SOCALLED“CONFUCIANORTHODOXY“,HISPOLITICALTHEORYSCONTENTISTOFOLLOWTHEEXAMPLEOFTHEMODERNWESTERNDEMOCRATICSYSTEMSOTHISTEXTTAKESTHETOPIC“BETWEENCONSERVATISMANDLIBERALISM“FORWIDECLEARINGENTANGLEDWITHINGBETWEENTHELIBERALISMANDCONSERVATISM,IDIVIDEFULLTEXTINTOCHAPTERFOURADOPTINGTHETOTALMETHODAFTERDIVIDINGFIRSTEXPLAINCONSERVATISMPROPERTYANDCHARACTERISTICOFHISOUTLOOKONLIFEINCHAPTERONEANALYZELIBERALISMFACTORANDINHERENTDEFECTOFHISDEMOCRATICCONSTITUTIONALTHEORYINCHAPTERTWOSUMUPHOWTOCOMBINECULTURALCONSERVATISMANDPOLITICALLIBERALISMINCHAPTERTHREEPURSUETHEREASONOFPHENOMENONTHATCULTURALCONSERVATISMANDPOLITICALLIBERALISMAPPEARCOMPATIBLYFROMSCIENCEASPECTINCHAPTERFOURTAKEABROADVIEWOFTHEFULLTEXT,WECANSEEINHERENTCONTRADICTIONNATUREBETWEENCULTURALCONSERVATISMANDPOLITICALLIBERALISM,ANDCULTURALCONSERVATISMWILLCAUSETHEBETRAYALOFPOLITICALLIBERALISMFINALLYKEYWORDSOUTLOOKONLIFEFREEWILLCULTURALCONSERVATISMPOLITICALLIBERALISM

簡介：碩士學位論文張君勱憲政哲學思想探究ONZHANGJUNMAI’STHOUGHTSABOUTCONSTITUTIONALPHILOSOPHY學科專業(yè)中國哲學研究生張磊磊指導(dǎo)教師王明雨副教授天津大學社外學院學院二零零八年五月A。BSTRACTINHISTORY，CHINAISANAUTHORITARIANCOUNTRY．WHENWESTERNCOUNTRIESHAVEBECOMEADEMOCRATICCOUNTRY，MODEMCHINAHASNOTENTEREDTHEORBITOFDEMOCRATICCOUNTRIES，HENCEMAKINGTHECONSTITUTION，IMPLEMENTINGTHECONSTITUTIONAL，BECOMINGADEMOCRATICCOUNTRY，THESEARETHECOLLLLNLONPURSUITOFALLMODEMCHINESE，INCLUDINGZHANGJUNMAI．COMPAREDTOTHESAMEPERIODOFMANYPEOPLE，ZHANGJUNMAIPERSISTENTPURSUITOFCONSTITUTIONALPOLITICS，HEDIDNOTSTOPTHISLIFETIMEPURSUIT．HEDIDNOTONLYRESEARCHTHESETHEORYPROPOSES，BUTALSOINVOLVEDINTHEDRAFTINGOFTHECONSTITUTIONANDCONSTITUTIONALMOVEMENT．THEPURSUITOFCONSTITUTIONALISMBECAMEAPARTOFZHANGJUNMAITHOUGHTSABOUTCONSTITUTIONALPHILOSOPHY．INTHISPAPER，THEWRITERINTRODUCESTHEBASISOFZHANGJUNMAITHOUGHTSABOUTCONSTITUTIONALPHILOSOPHY，HISTORYOFEVOLUTIONABOUTHISTHOUGHTS，IDEOLOGICALCHARACTERISTICS，ANDONTHISBASIS，THEAUTHORHASADISCUSSIONANDREFLECTION．THISPAPERISDIVIDEDINTOFIVEPARTSTHEFIRSTPARTFOCUSESONTHECURRENTSITUATION．OFRESEARCH，PROCESSOFHISTHOUGHTSANDHISDETERMINATIONTOPUTITTOPRACTICE．THOUGHTTHISPART，WECANUNDERSTANDTHEBACKGROUNDOFHISCONSTITUTIONALPHILOSOPHY；INTHESECONDPART，WERECOGNIZEHISIDEOLOGICALFOUNDATION，DESCRIBETHEAWARENESSANDUNDERSTANDINGOFHISCULTUREABOUTEASTANDWEST，RESEARCHHISBACKGROUNDOFTHECULTURESABOUTEASTANDWEST；INTHETHIRDPART，THEWRITERDISCUSSTHEHISTORYOFEVOLUTIONABOUTZHANGJUNMAICONSTITUTIONALPHILOSOPHY，DESCRIBETHEPROCESS，THATISFROMEUCKEN’SPHILOSOPHYTOKANT’SPHILOSOPHY．INTHISPROCESS，WEUNDERSTANDTHEROLEANDSIGNIFICANCEOFZHANGJUNMAICONSTITUTIONALPHILOSOPHYINBUILDINGADEMOCRATICCONSTITUTIONALGOVERNMENT；PARTIV，INWHICHTHEWRITERDESCRIBESTHECHARACTERISTICSOFZHANGJUNMAICONSTITUTIONALPHILOSOPHY,ISIMPORTANT；INTHEEND，THEWRITERTHINKSTHATZHANGJUNMAIPOLITICALAPPEALHADN’TACHIEVEDATTHEIDEALRESULTTHATHEEXPECTED，BUT，THEREWERESOMEREASONABLEFACTORSCONTAINEDINHISTHOUGHTS，THATWHATWESHOULDN’TBEABANDONEDBUTBEUTILIZEDANDDEVELOPEDWHENCONSTRUCTINGTHEMODEMNATION．KEYWORDSCONSTITUTIONALMORALANDLEGAL，F(xiàn)REEDOMOFSPIRIT，PHILOSOPHY,NATIONALCONSCIOUSNESS，UNITYOFCONFUCIANREVIVAL

簡介：山東大學博士學位論文莊子哲學的后現(xiàn)代解讀從中西哲學會通的角度姓名郭繼民申請學位級別博士專業(yè)中國哲學指導(dǎo)教師何中華20080315山東大學博士學位論文爾那里，作為西方本體的“邏格斯“無論在“言說”、真際、通達等義上與莊子之“道”均有著神似之處；在有機主義懷特海那里則通過物我不分、彼此相關(guān)的“相融“關(guān)系與“道“走到一起。但是，在解構(gòu)主義那罩，情況則完全不同因為本體已經(jīng)被解構(gòu)，不存在了，似乎莊子與解構(gòu)的后現(xiàn)代失去了共同語言。然而，饒有興味的是，當“本體”被解構(gòu)、消解之時，恰恰是后現(xiàn)代思維由“獨斷理性”走向發(fā)散、多元、開放之時。于是，后現(xiàn)代的“全視角主義’’思維模式在“道”所蘊涵的“全視閾’’維度上得到“展現(xiàn)”和“復(fù)活”以上就構(gòu)成了第二章的內(nèi)容。本文的第三章仍然圍繞形上之“道”而展開，不過，此處之論并非探討超越或玄秘之道的性質(zhì)，而是針對莊子聲稱“言而非道’’而又洋洋灑灑十數(shù)萬言的“悖論’’展開。其核心問題可歸結(jié)為道在哪個層面上可說說，可說，而在哪個層面上又不可說不可說，不說。對上述問題，筆者運用后現(xiàn)代主義的有關(guān)哲學理論進行了嘗試性的解讀。就“不可說“而言，結(jié)構(gòu)主義遵循的能指、所指把本體之道排除在能說的“經(jīng)驗”之外；解構(gòu)主義則通過拓展、推演能指、所指的“差異性”原則，消弭了能指與所指的界限，增大了“所說”與“要說“的裂隙，使得語言不能達到“文本“；后現(xiàn)代解釋學則通過言說主體消解的角度、文本生存論的角度、“成見、誤解”的角度以及解釋學目的之角度得出“語言一哲學的目的“不過是維持話語的進行“，并不能達到“道”本體。就“可說”的維度，則按照誰在說、說什么、怎樣說的思路進行了追問?！氨驹础敝f，乃為“道”說，道說的方式乃是通過“象”之呈現(xiàn)而進行的。聆聽大道的圣者，能通過象而達到“意“，進而得“道”。因此，本源之說應(yīng)為道言。但作為有創(chuàng)造力的人，亦能“制造’’語言，這使得語言雜然不純。正如莊子語言有所謂的精、粗和不期精粗之分別，西方語言學派亦把語言劃分為邏輯語言和同常語言。那么，是否諸種語言均能言說大道通過對象、言、意的分析，筆者認為即使語言能到達“道”，但須經(jīng)過鏡像一意象一幻象的逐步遞進和轉(zhuǎn)換，才有可能領(lǐng)悟到“不可說”之道?！霸鯓诱f”則凸顯了莊子“言道“的高超技巧，莊子言道乃通過“三言”即重占、寓言和卮言的方式而達成。其獨創(chuàng)風格的言說乃是“卮2

簡介：學校代碼10530學號201001020014分類號B2235密級碩士學位論文莊子內(nèi)篇哲學思想研究莊子內(nèi)篇哲學思想研究學位申請人田士輕指導(dǎo)教師王麗梅學院名稱哲學與歷史文化學院學科專業(yè)中國哲學研究方向中國古代哲學二〇一三年六月五日湘潭大學湘潭大學學位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明學位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明所呈交的論文是本人在導(dǎo)師的指導(dǎo)下獨立進行研究所取得的研究成果。除了文中特別加以標注引用的內(nèi)容外，本論文不包含任何其他個人或集體已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫的成果作品。對本文的研究做出重要貢獻的個人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標明。本人完全意識到本聲明的法律后果由本人承擔。作者簽名日期年月日學位論文版權(quán)使用授權(quán)書學位論文版權(quán)使用授權(quán)書本學位論文作者完全了解學校有關(guān)保留、使用學位論文的規(guī)定，同意學校保留并向國家有關(guān)部門或機構(gòu)送交論文的復(fù)印件和電子版，允許論文被查閱和借閱。本人授權(quán)湘潭大學可以將本學位論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫進行檢索，可以采用影印、縮印或掃描等復(fù)制手段保存和匯編本學位論文。涉密論文按學校規(guī)定處理。作者簽名日期年月日導(dǎo)師簽名日期年月日

簡介：延邊大學碩士學位論文張載和曹植哲學思想比較姓名管延江申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)外國哲學指導(dǎo)教師方浩范20070525THEPHILOSOPHYTHOUGHTCOMPARISONOFZH秈GZAIANDCAOZHIABSTRACTZHANGZAIISTHECHINESENONHEMSONGDYN唧YTJME他NOWNEDPH．10SOPHELONEOFSONGBRIGHTNEOCONFUCI邪ISMPATHNNDERS，THEGUANZHONGSCHOOIINITIATO‘THEPOSITIVEINITIATOROF‘THEPR∞TICAIJNOWIEDGE”INSONGYUANMINGTIME．ALIHOU曲THETVVOPEOPIEIIVEINDIFRERENTCO帥TRIES鋤DTIME，∞TUA¨YTHEYHAVETHEVERYSTMNGSIMILA“TYANDTHECOMMEASURABIIITY．NVERYMANY嬲PECTS，STUDIESZH卸GZAIANDTHECAOZHIPHILOSOPHICTHINKING，INOW卸DGR舔PSTHECHINE∞CONFUCI卸ISM，GUANZHONGSCHOOL，∞UTILSOUTHKOREATHEDEEPSTUDY．SONGDY九ASTYNEO．CONFUCIANISM’STHOUGHTCONNOTATION，TOFHNHERLILOWTHECHINAANDSOUTHKOREATHOU曲TCULTURE硼DTHENAT．ONALSP疏HAVETHEPOSITIVESIGN訊CANCE．THISANICIEW船F(xiàn)BMTHEORYOFHUM鋤MAKINGS，THETHEORYOFHUM跏NATUM，PR∞TICALLNOWIEDGCTHOUGHTTHR∞ASPECTSTHEPHILOSOPHICTH．NKJNGH舔CONDUCTEDTHE陀SEARCH卸DTHECOMP盯ISONTOZH明GZAIANDCAOZHI．THEP印ERCONSJSTSOFTHEINTI_ODUCTION．THISDISCUSSES，THECONCIUSION．THEINTMDUCTIONMAINLYINTRODUCEDTHISAN．CLE陀辯ARCHGOAL．SIGN訊C舶CE跏DTHEPRESENTSITUATION，卸DPROPO辯THEB∞ICMENTAIITY鋤DTHEPRIMARYCOVERAGE．THISDISCUSSESTHEPAFTDIVIDEFBURCHAPTEI．SC∞ZHIBIOGRAPHY徹DTHETIMEB∞KGROUNDOFPMDUCINGTLLEPHIIOSOPHICTHINKING，F(xiàn)BMTWOHUMANOFBIOGMPHYMARKS、INDIVIDUAL．TYCHAMCTER．STICPROMPTGENERATIONOFBACKGROUND卵EISTHECOMPARISON“THECONNECTIONTERRITO咿’．ZAI鯽DTHECAOZHIGASTOCAN了ONTHECOMPARISON；FUNHERMO佗，CARFIESONTHECOMP盯ISONTOZHANGZAI鋤DTHEC∞ZHIHEOFYOFHUMANNATUFETHOUGHT；FINAIIY’CARRIESONTHECOMPAR．SONTOZHANGZAIANDTHECAOZHIPMCTICALL110WIEDGETHOUGHT；’2

簡介：分類號??烈???．UDC??????．密級?公?亞?一多毋廬夕擎碩士研究生學位論文張立文哲學思想研究申請人學號培養(yǎng)單位學科專業(yè)研究方向指導(dǎo)教師完成日期謝東璋2130021哲學學院中國哲學中國現(xiàn)代哲學樊志輝教授2016年3月18日黑龍江大學碩士學位論文ABSTRACTPROFESSORZHANGLIWENISAFAMOUSPHILOSOPHERINCONTEMPORARYCHINA，THEFROMTHEEARLYSTUDYOFZHUXI’STHOUGHTTO”THETHEORYOFTHELOGICALSTRUCTUREOFCHINESEPHILOSOPHY”，F(xiàn)ROM”TRADITIONAL”TOTHE”NEWSCIENCEINTRODUCTION”，F(xiàn)INALLYCONSTRUCT”THETHEORYOFHARMONYOFTHELOGICALSTRUCTUREOFTHESYSTEM”，TORESOLVETHEMANKINDINTHE21STCENTURYAREFACINGTHEFIVECONFLICTSANDCRISIS．ONTHEMODERNIZATIONOFCHINESEPHILOSOPHY,THEINNOVATIVERESEARCHMETHODSOF”SELFTALK”AND”TALKABOUTYOURSELF”AREPUTFORWARDFORTHEFIRSTTIME．RESEARCHOFZHANGLIWENPHILOSOPHY,CHINESEPHILOSOPHYMODERNIZATIONANDINNOVATIONHASIMPORTANTSIGNIFICANCE，ALSOWITHCHINESETRADITIONALPHILOSOPHYMODERNIZATIONOFREINCARNATIONTOSOLVEPROBLEMSFACEDBYTODAY’SWORLDOFHUMANATTEMPT．MORECONDUCIVETOINCONTEMPORARYCHINESEPHILOSOPHYRESEARCHOVERALLGRASPOFRESEARCHDEVELOPMENT．KEYWORDSCHINESEPHILOSOPHY；CULTURALINNOVATION；LIWENZHANG；HEHEPHILOSOPHY

簡介：山西大學2008屆碩士學位論文建構(gòu)論視野中的社會科學哲學作者姓名指導(dǎo)教師學科專業(yè)研究方向培養(yǎng)單位學習年限史云石殷杰教授科學技術(shù)哲學社會科學哲學科學技術(shù)哲學研究中心2005年9月2008年6月二OOJK年六月中文摘要本論文由引言、建構(gòu)論與社會科學哲學的興起、建構(gòu)論與社會科學哲學的發(fā)展、建構(gòu)論之于社會科學哲學的意義、結(jié)論等幾部分組成。引言部分對本論文的選題、主旨、提綱、國內(nèi)外研究狀況及寫作意義做了詳細說明，簡單介紹了各專題性論述的主要內(nèi)容，澄清了論文中的主要概念、觀點。本論文的主要目的是以社會建構(gòu)主義為線索，理清社會科學哲學的基本哲學思想，恢復(fù)社會科學和社會科學哲學的批判指導(dǎo)功能等。借以此，本論文主要展開了以下幾部分的論述。第一部分詳細分析了建構(gòu)論與社會科學的興起。就目前的研究狀況來看，關(guān)于科學、社會科學的重新理解和定位，都仍處于方興未艾的局面。本論文首先從其理論根源談起，顯然，關(guān)于建構(gòu)論與社會科學哲學研究的興起是很多因素使然的結(jié)果，從社會建構(gòu)論的角度來看，社會科學哲學的研究興起主要有以下幾個方面的理論根源，分別從啟蒙思想、現(xiàn)代主義思潮和后現(xiàn)代主義思潮的影響；社會學的影響和語言、社會心理學的危機三部分進行了闡述。在論文的第二部分，主要論述了建構(gòu)論與社會科學哲學的發(fā)展思想，這部分主要從建構(gòu)論視野中的科學觀、建構(gòu)論視野中的社會實踐觀、建構(gòu)論視野中的真理觀和建構(gòu)論視野中的人生觀四部分進行了闡發(fā)。首先，在建構(gòu)論視野中的科學觀中，論述了科學知識社會學的科學觀和后現(xiàn)代女性主義科學觀其次，在建構(gòu)論視野中的社會實踐觀中，通過對兩個代表人物的社會實踐觀思想進行介紹，即布迪厄的“實踐理論”和吉登斯的建構(gòu)主義思想，論述了從社會建構(gòu)主義的角度來看，社會科學哲學在社會實踐方面的基本思想；再次，在建構(gòu)論視野中的真理觀這部分中，主要從真理的客觀性和普遍標準被打破，科學是真理的化身被推翻，對認識真理相對性的重新詮釋等方面展開了闡述；在這一部分的最后，文章對建構(gòu)論視野中的人生觀進行了分析，對社會科學哲學思想中人生觀的總結(jié)和概述是一項比較復(fù)雜的工作，本論文主要從五部分將其進行了論述“集體主義”觀點的興起、“和諧”觀念深入人心、對社會問題的重新詮釋、以人為本，全面認識人類自身、反思性觀念重新建立。在論文的第三部分中，文章對建構(gòu)論之于社會科學哲學的意義做出了論述，這部分重點從認識論意義、方法論意義和本體論意義進行了論述，通過對這三方面的意義進行闡述，使我們更加清晰地看到了以社會建構(gòu)主義為視野來看待社會科學哲學思想的重要性。

簡介：湖南師范大學碩士學位論文庫恩派還是波普派拉卡托斯科學哲學思想定位研究姓名王永申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)科學技術(shù)哲學指導(dǎo)教師萬丹20090501ABSTRACTIMRELAKATOSISTHEVERYIMPORTANTPHI10SOPHEROFSCIENCE．HISSOPHISTICATEDFALSIFICATIONISMANDMETHODOLOGYOFSCIENTIFICRESEARCHPROGR鋤SATTRACTALOTOFATTENTION，ANDAREWIDELYUSEDINDIFFERENTFIELDSOFDISCIPLINES．STEMMINGFROMTHEINTENSEC011ISIONBETWEENPOPPER’SPHILOSOPHYANDKUHN’SPHI10SOPHY，LAKATOS’PHI10SOPHYOFSCIENCEMAKESANACTIVEREVISIONANDINNOVATIONFORTHEDATTERNSOFTHEDEVELOPMENTOFTHESCIENCEOFTHETWOSENIORS．FORALONGTERM，THEREISNOCLEARSTATUSFORLAKATOS．ITISOFTENREGARDEDASTWOKINDSOFPOSITIONSFIRST，HEBELONGSTOHISTORICISMOFSCIENCE．SECOND，HEISAFALSIFICATIONIST．BUTTHEYARETOOVAGUETOEXACTLYEXPRESSTHEDELICATERELATIONSHIPA舶ONGKUHN’S，POPPER’SANDLAKATOS’THOUGHTS．WEMUSTCARRYOUTTHECOMPARISONSAMONGTHEPHILOSOPHYOFSCIENCEOFLAKATOS，KUHN，ANDPOPPER，ANDSETANEWPOSITIONFORLAKATOS．CENTERINGONHISPATTERNOFTHEDEVELOPMENTOFTHESCIENCE，THEPAPERCONDUCTSASODETAILEDANALYSISABOUTTHEVIEWOFEXPERIMENTTHEORY，SCIENTIFICEVALUATIONANDCRITERIONOFDEMARCATION，ANDMODELSOFSCIENTIFICDEVELODMENTASTOELABORATEINDEPTHTHEREALISMROOTSHIDDENBEHINDLAKATOS’PATTERNOFTHEDEVELOPMENTOFTHESCIENCE．THEPAPERTRIESITSBESTTOFINDOUTTHEPROPERPOSITIONFORLAKATOSINTHEHISTORYOFPHILOSOPHYOFSCIENCE，THATIS，AKUHNIANPHI10SOPHEROFSCIENCEFROMKUHNISM．THEREARETWOPURPOSESOFTHECOMPARISONSANDPOSITIONINGⅡ

簡介：分類號???．8???UDC密級?公?開?～Z參廬夕擎碩士研究生學位論文彼得洛維奇早期實踐哲學研究申請人學號培養(yǎng)單位學科專業(yè)研究方向指導(dǎo)教師完成日期桑蕾2130008哲學學院馬克思主義哲學馬克思哲學思想及其當代意義姜海波教授2016年3月5日黑龍江大學碩士學位論文ABSTRACTGAJOPETROVI6WASTHEFLAGBEAREROFPRACTICEOFYUGOSLAVIA．HEINSISTEDOFFPRACTICALPHILOSOPHYINHISEARLIERTIMES，WHICHRESULTEDINREVOLUTIONARYIDEASLATER．HISEARLYPRACTICALPHILOSOPHYREEVALUATEDTHESYSTEMOFMARXISTPHILOSOPHYSYSTEMONTHECRITICISMOFTHESTALINSYSTEM．HEHELDAPLACEINTHETRADITIONALOFTHEPRACTICEOFYUGOSLAVIA．HISANALYTICALPHILOSOPHYREPRODUCEUSTHEPRACTICECHARACTERISTICOFMARXISTPHILOSOPHY，ANDWITHCONSIDERABLEVALUEANDSPECIALSIGNIFICANCE．THISARTICLEMAKESANRESEARCHONTHEEARLYPRACTICALPHILOSOPHYOFGAJOPETROVID，INCLUDINGTHREECHAPTERSEXCEPTINTRODUCTIONANDCONCLUSION．THEINTRODUCTIONINTRODUCESTHELIFETIMEOFGAJOPETROVI6ANDTHERESEARCHSTATUSABOUTHIM．CHAPTERONERETROSPECTIVESTHETHEORETICALSOURCES，CHAPTERTWOINTRODUCESTHEBASICCONTENT，CHAPTERTHREETALKSABOUTTHECONTEMPORARYVALUE．ATLASTTHEARTICLEREACHESTOTHECONCLUSION．THERESEARCHBASESONTHEREADINGOFEXTENSIVELITERATURE，ANDDRAWSTHEFOLLOWINGCONCLUSIONSGAJOPETROVI6RETURNEDTOTHEPHILOSOPHICALNATUREOFMARXISTPHILOSOPHY．HESTARTEDFROMTHEHUMANCONCEPTOFMARX，GOTANEWPAPERABOUTMARXISTPHILOSOPHY,THROUGHTALKINGABOUTTHEMETAPHYSICALPARTOFPRACTICALPHILOSOPHY,SUCHASPRACTICE，EXISTENCE，TRUTH，REFLECTION，DISSIMILATION，HUMANITARIANISM，EXPOUNDEDTHEONTOLOGY,EPISTEMOLOGY,METHODOLOGYANDTHETHEORYOFVALUEOFHISPRACTICALPHILOSOPHY,WHICHELUCIDATEDAPRACTICALPHILOSOPHYOFMARXISM．KEYWORDSPETROVI6，PRACTICALPHILOSOPHY,HUMANITARIANISM，CRITIQUE

簡介：蘇州大學學位論文獨創(chuàng)性聲明．2749282本人鄭重聲明所提交的學位論文是本人在導(dǎo)師的指導(dǎo)下，獨立進行研究工作所取得的成果。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外，本論文不含其他個人或集體己經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的研究成果，也不含為獲得蘇州大學或其它教育機構(gòu)的學位證書而使用過的材料。對本文的研究作出重要貢獻的個人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標明。本人承擔本聲明的法律責任。論文作者簽名拯盤壟一日～蘇州大學學位論文使用授權(quán)聲明本人完全了解蘇州大學關(guān)子收集、保存和使用學位論文的規(guī)定，即學位論文著作權(quán)歸屬蘇州大學。本學位論文電子文檔的內(nèi)容和紙質(zhì)論文的內(nèi)容相一致。蘇州大學有權(quán)向國家圖書館、中國社科院文獻信息情報中心、中國科學技術(shù)信息研究所含萬方數(shù)據(jù)電子出版社、中國學術(shù)期刊光盤版電子雜志社送交本學位論文的復(fù)印件和電子文檔，允許論文被查閱和借閱，可以采用影印、縮印或其他復(fù)制手段保存和匯編學位論文，可以將學位論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫進行檢索。．涉密論文口本學位論文屬‘在年二月解密后適用本規(guī)定。非涉密論文留．’論文作者簽名毯墊抱EL期導(dǎo)師簽名期型壘堡壘圖翌臼喇乙∥舊

簡介：點擊查看更多莊子“游”的人生哲學研究精彩內(nèi)容。