gre作文argument高頻前50提綱+中文分析 (1)

1、<p>　　1. 53, （生命科學/科學假說/并列）Thirteen years ago, researchers studied a group of 25 infants(1) who showed signs of mild distress(4) when exposed to unfamiliar stimuli such as an unusual odor or a tape recording of an u

2、nknown voice. They discovered that these infants were more likely than other infants to have been conceived in early autumn(2), a time when their mothers' production of melatonin(3)—a hormone known to affect some bra

3、in functions—would naturally increase in response to decreased daylight. In</p><p>　　The sample of the mentioned study is too limited. (quantity of the sample) ★★★</p><p>　　No direct evidence is

4、 provided to show that it is the high levels of mothers’ production of Melatonin that resulted in the distress showed by the infants studied. (confusing concurrence with causality) ★★★★</p><p>　　The author f

5、ails to prove that increased levels of mothers’ production of Melatonin will directly affect their infants. (U.A) ★★★★</p><p>　　The author simply equates mild distress with shyness. (U.C) ★★★★</p><

6、;p>　　Different individuals may define the term shy in various ways. (definition of the term ‘shy’) ★★★★</p><p>　　Many other genetic or environmental factors will cause shyness in those teenagers. (I.T) ★★

7、★★</p><p>　　25 infants,mild distress 論斷：出生前某素的高含量會使嬰兒害羞，而且這種害羞會繼續(xù)。因為研究者在13年前對25個對陌生刺激表現(xiàn)敏感的嬰兒進行了研究，發(fā)現(xiàn)他們比其他嬰兒更多地在秋季懷上。而秋季母親體內(nèi)的影響大腦功能的某素產(chǎn)量會因為日光的下降而天然上升。如今這25名嬰兒都十幾歲了，今年一項跟蹤調(diào)查發(fā)現(xiàn)他們大部分都認為自己很害羞。 ·論斷忽略了一個前提，就是某

8、素是否會導致嬰兒害羞。論者沒有提供任何對某素的科學研究，以說明某素的功能或是作用是什么。論者甚至沒有提供資料證明某素是否會對嬰兒產(chǎn)生影響。雖然論者說某素是一種對某些大腦功能有影響的荷爾蒙，但并沒有告訴我們這種影響是對母親，還是對胎兒。 ·論斷的論據(jù)沒有說服力。論斷引用一項13年前對25個對陌生刺激反應敏感的嬰兒的研究和今年的跟蹤研究。但首先論者沒有提供資料表明嬰兒表現(xiàn)出來的敏感一下是因為害羞，我們不能排除這是因為刺激帶來的生理

9、上的不舒服。而在跟蹤研究中，論者也沒有提供有關(guān)這些孩子在這十幾年里的生活環(huán)境的資料，我們不能排除環(huán)境對孩子性格的影響。 ·論斷的結(jié)論很武斷。論斷某素的高含量會導致嬰兒害羞，并在后面的生活中延</p><p>　　2. 51，（醫(yī)療/建議/對比）The following appeared in a medical newsletter. </p><p>　　"Doct

10、ors have long suspected that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. This hypothesis has now been proved by preliminary results of a study of two groups of patients. T

11、he first group of patients, all being treated for muscle injuries by Dr. Newland, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine, took antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment. Their recuperation time was, on averag

12、e, 40 percent quicker than typically expected. Patients</p><p>　　The author does not inform us about the severity of injuries, physical conditions of the two groups of patients. (I.C) ★★★★</p><p&g

13、t;　　There might be other differences between treatments offered by the two doctors.(I.C) ★★★★</p><p>　　Sugar pills may cause negative effects on the healing of the second group of patients. (I.T) ★★</p>

14、;<p>　　Not all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain will suffer from secondary infections. (C.S) ★★★★</p><p>　　Not all patients with muscle strain are suitable to taking antibiotics. (feasibi

15、lity of the conclusion) ★★★★</p><p>　　secondary infections,muscle strain 論斷：要建議有肌肉拉傷的病人服用抗生素。因為醫(yī)生最近證實二次感染會防礙病人快速康復。在一項對兩組病人的研究中，第一組病人由專門從事體育藥品的醫(yī)生治療，并在整個治療中服用抗生素，他們比一般的病人快40%康復；第二組病人由普通醫(yī)生治療，盡管病人以為服用的是抗生素，但實際吃

16、的是糖片，他們的康復時間沒有明顯下降。 ·論斷的前提不一定成立。前提是二次感染一定會發(fā)生。但是論者沒有提供任何資料證明二次感染會發(fā)生在肌肉拉傷的病人身上，或是這種病人容易發(fā)生二次感染。 ·論斷引用的論據(jù)沒有說服力。論斷引用了一項分組研究。但是首先論者沒有提供任何有關(guān)兩組病人的資料。有關(guān)他們的年齡、性別以及其他生理特征。有可能服用抗生素的一組病人比較年輕，或是本身生理機能好，而不服用的一組病人可能都是體質(zhì)弱的人。這樣就

17、不能說明是抗生素而不是其他原因使得病人康復快。另外兩位醫(yī)生的經(jīng)驗和水平也會影響病人康復的速度，一般來說運動醫(yī)生會比普通醫(yī)生更了解肌肉的問題，所以由他治療的病人康復快，就不能排除是因為他的水平高或是治療有針對性造成，這樣也不能說明是抗生素使得病</p><p>　　3. 45, （動物/推測/并列）The following appeared as an editorial in a wildlife journa

18、l.</p><p>　　"Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic region. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of a year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm

19、enough to sustain the plants on which they feed, and cold enough, at least some of the year, for the ice to cover the sea separating the islands, allowing the deer to travel over it. Unfortunately, according to reports f

20、rom local hunters(1), the deer populations are declining. Since these reports coincide with re</p><p>　　The accuracy of the reports from local hunters can be cast doubt on. (selective sample) ★★★★</p>

21、<p>　　The global warming trends may have no effects on the specific region mentioned by the editorial. (C.S) ★★★★</p><p>　　Alternative explanations can also account for the decline in arctic deer popul

22、ation.(NCR) ★★★★</p><p>　　The change in climate patterns does not necessarily lead to the decline in deer population, deer may adapt themselves to the new weather by certain means. (NCR) ★★★★</p><

23、p>　　Arctic deer 論斷：鹿的數(shù)目下降的原因是氣溫上升。因為氣溫上升使得海上的冰融化，鹿無法按照傳統(tǒng)在冰凍的海面上遷徒。他舉例說，最近當?shù)氐墨C人報告說鹿的數(shù)目在下降，而這種下降又伴隨全球氣溫上升的趨勢。 ·論斷的前提不一定成立。前提是當?shù)氐臍鉁氐拇_在上升。但是論者沒有提供任何資料證明當?shù)氐臍鉁乇纫郧案吡恕?·得出論斷的前提是鹿的數(shù)目的確在下降。但是論者僅用當?shù)孬C人的報告，不足以證明。因為很有可能獵人

24、只是因為打不到鹿，而認為鹿數(shù)目在下降。但是這些獵人活動的時間、范圍以及習慣是否與鹿相同都會影響到他們是否能看見鹿。 ·論斷的另一個前提是，氣溫上升會導致鹿數(shù)目下降。但是論者沒有提供任何資料證明如果氣溫上升，環(huán)境改變，鹿就會死亡。氣溫上升或許會使鹿生存的環(huán)境發(fā)生變化，它們的活動模式或許必需有所改變，但這些都不必造成鹿死亡。 ·論斷引用的證據(jù)沒有說服力。論斷說鹿數(shù)目下降的同時伴隨全球氣溫上升的趨勢。但全球勢趨不能代表本地

25、狀況，很有可能全球某些地方氣溫升高很快，使得全球氣溫上升，但本地的氣溫仍可能不變，甚至下降。 ·論者的結(jié)論很武斷。他認為是氣溫上升改變了鹿的遷徒模式，而不是其他原因?qū)е侣箶?shù)目</p><p>　　4. 7, （政治經(jīng)濟，社會/提議/并列）The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Clearview newspaper. </p&

26、gt;<p>　　"In the next mayoral election, residents of Clearview should vote for Ann Green, who is a member of the Good Earth Coalition, rather than for Frank Braun, a member of the Clearview town council(3), b

27、ecause the current members are not protecting our environment. For example, during the past year the number of factories in Clearview has doubled(1), air pollution levels have increased, and the local hospital has treate

28、d 25 percent more patients with respiratory illnesses(2). If we elect Ann Green, </p><p>　　The argument unfairly assumes that last year's increase in the number of factories was due to the city council&

29、#39;s decisions—rather than to some other phenomenon—and that this increase poses environmental problems for Clearview. (NCR) ★★★★</p><p>　　The argument also assumes unfairly that last year's increase in

30、 the number of patients reporting respiratory problems indicates worsening environmental problems in Clearview. (NCR) ★★★★</p><p>　　The editorial provides no evidence to substantiate the assumption that Bra

31、un was a factor in the city council’s decisions. (I.I) ★★</p><p>　　The mere fact that Green is a member of the Good Earth Coalition hardly suffices to prove her willingness and ability to help solve Clearvi

32、ew's environmental problems. (I.E) ★★★★★</p><p>　　The author provides no firm evidence that electing Green is necessary to solve those problems, or that electing Green would suffice. (necessity and suff

33、iciency of the solution) ★★★</p><p>　　Clearview mayoral election 論斷：選Ann Green，環(huán)境問題肯定能解決，因為他是Good Earth Coalition。論斷認為人們沒有選另一位政府成員是因為現(xiàn)在的環(huán)境太糟糕，污染非常嚴重。 ·論斷太武斷。論為選一位環(huán)境組織的成員當市長，環(huán)境污染問題就能解決。但實際上作為環(huán)境組織的成員只能表明他

34、對環(huán)境很關(guān)注，而政府要解決污染問題，除了關(guān)心以外還會有大量具體工作要作。比如協(xié)調(diào)其他部門，比如對工業(yè)生產(chǎn)的了解等等，這些都不是出身就必然能具備的素質(zhì)。論斷沒有提供該候選人的這方面資料。 ·論斷不公平。說現(xiàn)行政府不關(guān)心保護環(huán)境，舉例說是過去幾年工廠的數(shù)目加倍，空氣污染的程度在上升，而當?shù)蒯t(yī)院治療的呼吸病患者也比以前多了25%。但是論斷沒有告訴我們新增的工廠是否是污染型產(chǎn)業(yè)，這些工廠有沒有采取防止污染的措施，沒有這種資料我們無法判

35、斷這些工廠對于環(huán)境污染的影響程度，因為很可能這些工廠是污染少的新興產(chǎn)業(yè)，或是采取了有效措施。而說到空氣污染的問題，一方面這是一個全球共同面臨的狀況，論斷沒有說明該市與其他相同特征的城市相比，或是與早前的歷史相比，這個數(shù)字是大是小，從而無法判斷</p><p>　　5. 35, （食品，保健/預言/并列）The following appeared in the summary of a study on head

36、aches suffered by the residents of Mentia.</p><p>　　"Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches(1). Although many foods are naturally rich in sali

37、cylates, for the past several decades food-processing companies have also been adding salicylates to foods as preservatives. This rise in the commercial use of salicylates has been found to correlate with a steady declin

38、e in the average number of headaches reported by participants in our twenty-year study(2). Recently, food-processing companies hav</p><p>　　Salicylates may not have the same effect as aspirin in treating hea

39、daches although they are of the same chemical family. (F.A) ★★★★</p><p>　　Other factors may also lead to the decline in the number of headaches in the study mentioned above. (NCR) ★★★★★</p><p>　

40、　The author does not inform us what fraction of foods consumed by citizens of Mentia contains salicylates, and how many of the citizens prefer such kind of foods. (I.I) ★★★</p><p>　　The author fails to consi

41、der factors other than food, such as environment, lifestyle, etc. that may result in the increase in the number of headaches suffered by citizens of Mentia would increase (I.T) ★★★</p><p>　　Granted that sali

42、cylates are effective in treating headaches, we cannot hastily infer that they would also be effective in preventing headaches. (U.C) ★★★</p><p>　　headaches，residents of Mentia 論斷：S的新用途會繼續(xù)平穩(wěn)地降低居民平均頭疼。因為S與阿斯匹

43、林同屬一個化學家庭。過去幾十年中食品公司把S做為防腐劑添加到食品中，一項長達二十年的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)這種商業(yè)用途的增加伴隨著頭疼報告的下降。 ·論斷的前提不被必然保證。論斷的前提是S能治療或降低頭疼。但是論者并沒有提供有關(guān)的科學研究以證明S具有這樣的作用。雖然論者說S與阿斯匹林同屬一個化學家庭，但這只能說明他們的化學結(jié)構(gòu)相近，并不能保證必然具有與阿斯匹林一樣的作用。 ·論斷的論據(jù)不具備說服力。論斷引用一份二十年的研究，這份研

44、究說在S被食品商用于防腐劑的年代里，研究中報告頭疼的人少了。首先論者沒能排除有人頭疼但沒報告的可能性。其次是他也沒能排除其他因素導致頭疼下降的可能，比如醫(yī)學發(fā)達，環(huán)境質(zhì)量好了，人們生活規(guī)律了等等。這都不能說明S的食用降低了頭疼的發(fā)生。 ·論者的結(jié)論非常武斷。他認為頭疼還會有持續(xù)穩(wěn)步下降，但就算S真能影響頭疼也還可能會有其他因素導致頭疼上升，比如生活節(jié)奏加快、工作壓力突然加大等等。另外如果S對頭疼有作用，是否是越多越好，論斷也沒

45、有給出依據(jù)。結(jié)論：論者所做的結(jié)</p><p>　　6. 188, （醫(yī)藥衛(wèi)生/建議/對比）A new report suggests that men and women experience pain very differently from one another, and that doctors should consider these differences when prescribing pa

46、in medications(3). When researchers administered the same dosage of kappa opioids—a painkiller—to 28 men and 20 women(1) who were having their wisdom teeth extracted, the women reported(5) feeling much less pain than the

47、 men, and the easing of pain lasted considerably longer in women(2). This research suggests that k</p><p>　　1. The number of subjects might be insufficient to constitute a representative sample. (quantity o

48、f the sample) ★★★</p><p>　　2. Other differences between those men and women could also explain the difference between their feelings on pain. (I.C) ★★★★</p><p>　　3. The effect of kappa opioids

49、 on pain feeling could not be hastily generalized to all other pain medications. (C.S) ★★★★</p><p>　　4. The effect of kappa opioids on patients who have their wisdom teeth extracted could not be hastily gen

50、eralized to all conditions where pain medication is required. (C.S) ★★★</p><p>　　5. The level of pain reported by the patients may not reflect their actual level of pain. (U.C) ★★★</p><p>　　6.

51、 Without more information concerning the thorough effect of kappa opioids, and lacking comparison between the effectiveness of kappa opiods and other available pain medications, we cannot conclude that it is not suitable

52、 for all male patients merely based on the fact cited above. (adv:disadv/confusing comparison and variation) ★★★</p><p>　　7. Granted that pain medications should be prescribed discriminatingly, the necessit

53、y of reevaluating the effects of all medications on men versus women is unwarranted. (C.S/necessity of the solution) ★★★★</p><p>　　men and women experience pain very differently from one another 論斷：只要止痛藥需要就要

54、給女的開K，而男的應該開別的藥。另外研究者應該對所有藥對于男女不同的效果重新評估。因為一份新的報告顯示，男女對痛的經(jīng)歷非常不同，醫(yī)生應該考慮給他們開不同的止痛藥。研究中給在撥智齒的28個男人和20個女人開同樣劑量的K，女的比男的少說痛，而且藥效女的也明顯長一些。 ·前提，K對女的有效，對男的沒效。撥牙一項不能代表所有的情況。 ·前提，男女對疼痛的經(jīng)歷不同，沒有直接證據(jù)證明。而·論據(jù)，問題多。首先，人太少，沒

55、有代表性。其次，也許不是性別帶來的不同，而是其他體質(zhì)上的問題。沒有說是否每一個女人都比每一個男人少說痛。第三，心理影響。報告的痛有心理作用，而醫(yī)學關(guān)心的止痛是生理問題。不排除女的意志力堅強，所以少說痛。 ·就算男女對K的經(jīng)歷不一樣，沒有理由存在需要對所有的藥都重新評估。</p><p>　　7. 161, （社會/論斷/對比）In a study of reading habits of Leevill

56、e citizens conducted by the University of Leeville, most respondents(1) said they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a follow-up study(4,5) conducted by the same researchers found that the type of

57、book most frequently checked out(2) of each of the public libraries(6) in Leeville was the mystery novel(3). Therefore, it can be concluded that the respondents in the first study had misrepresented their reading habits(

58、7).</p><p>　　We do not know how many, and what kind of citizens responded to the survey, thus the representativeness of the result is open to doubt. (are the respondents representative?) ★★★</p><p

59、>　　The frequency of certain type of book being checked out from the public libraries is not a good indication of what kind of reading material do citizens prefer. (U.C) ★★★★</p><p>　　The author does not a

60、nalyze to what extent the literary classics and mystery novels mentioned in the argument overlap. (I.I) ★★★★</p><p>　　The author fails to provide evidence to show that the result of the follow-up study is re

61、presentative of all-time reading habits of Leeville citizens. (C→F) ★★★</p><p>　　We do not know how long is the interim period between the two studies, many conditions may change after sufficient long time.(

62、P→C) ★★★★</p><p>　　The author unfairly assumes that the respondents in the first study borrow most of their reading materials from public libraries. (U.A) ★★★</p><p>　　The author fails to consid

63、er other explanation that could explain the discrepancy between the respondents’ answer and the result of the follow-up study, e.g. if the respondents were forthright, if they correctly understood the survey’s question,

64、etc. (necessity of the solution) ★★★</p><p>　　reading habits of Leeville citizens 論斷：居民不是最愛看古典文學。一項由L校進行的該地區(qū)居民閱讀習慣研究中，大多數(shù)被訪者說他們最愛看古典文學。但是他們隨后進行的研究又發(fā)現(xiàn)該地區(qū)每個公共圖書館里最常被借的是神話小說。 ·古典文學里有很多都是神話小說。奧德賽，希望神話都是古典小說

65、。 First at all , the mystery novels can also be literary classics. The arguer undercounted the scope of "literary classics" . in fact, all book write by writers past and made great successes in readers can be c

66、alled "literary classics", there are many mystery novels such as the "Odessey" and "Greek Mysterious story" have long been considered </p><p>　　8. 169, （人事，學校建設/提議/類比）The follow

67、ing appeared in a letter from a department chairperson to the president of Pierce University. </p><p>　　"Some studies conducted by Bronston College, which is also located in a small town, reveal that bo

68、th male and female professors are happier(1) living in small towns when their spouses are also employed in the same geographic area. Therefore, in the interest of attracting the most(5) gifted teachers and researchers to

69、 our faculty and improving the morale of our entire(3) staff(5), we at Pierce University should offer employment to the spouse of each new faculty member we hire(2,4,7,9). Although w</p><p>　　The fact that p

70、rofessors are happier living in small towns might be due to other factors, but not because they are living together with their spouses. (NCR) ★★</p><p>　　The chairperson fails to consider the possible differ

71、ences between Bronston College and Pierce University, thus merely copying Bronston’s activity may not be same effective at Pierce. (F.A) ★★★</p><p>　　The chairperson fails to point out what fraction of our f

72、aculty will be new members, thus the assumption that the morale of entire staff could be improved is open to doubt. (I.I/U.A) ★★★</p><p>　　The chairperson fails to consider many other relevant factors that m

73、ay influence new professors’ decision. (I.T/sufficiency of the solution) ★★★★</p><p>　　Even if the proposed actions are effective in attracting new professors, we cannot guarantee that the action will attrac

74、t the most gifted teachers and researchers, and necessarily improving the morale of stuff. (sufficiency of the solution) ★★★</p><p>　　The chairperson does not analyze the cost of the proposed actions, hence

75、we cannot evaluate if the new professors attracted by the action are worthy of the investment. (adv:disadv) ★★★</p><p>　　The chairperson fails to consider if the university has the capability of offering emp

76、loyment to the spouse of every new faculty member. (feasibility of the conclusion) ★★★★ </p><p>　　The chairperson fails to illustrate that new gifted professors will not accept our offers if we do not offer

77、such employment. (necessity of the solution) ★★★</p><p>　　The chairperson overlooks other better ways to achieve the same result. (necessity of the solution) ★★</p><p>　　professors happier livin

78、g when spouses in the same geographic area 論斷：為吸引最有才能的老師和研究者來我們學校并提高整體員工的士氣，我們應該給每位新員工的配偶提供工作機會。因為如果配偶有工作的機會，新教授會更愿意來我們這兒。盡管不可能所有位子都被接受或是看成理想的選擇，花在這上的錢也會很值。一個也在小城市的B校的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，男女教授都會更快樂地生活在小鎮(zhèn)上，當他們的配偶也在同一個地區(qū)工作時。 B校的研究描述不清楚，無法

79、判斷是否在一起生活會比不在一起生活更快樂，所以無法判斷是否準確。但另外推論中也同樣有問題。 ·提高士氣，愉快的夫妻生活不保證高的士氣，校風，工作，工資都很重要 ·在一起生活愉快，但沒有證據(jù)證明配偶的工作地點是教授們選擇工作的唯一或重要標準。所以不一定更吸引人。 ·如果這筆花費不小，就不能給每個新員工都提供。 ·最有才能的？</p><p>　　9. 203, （醫(yī)療衛(wèi)生/論

80、斷/對比）The following appeared in a newspaper feature story.</p><p>　　"At the small, nonprofit hospital in the town of Saluda, the average length of a patient's stay is two days(2); at the large, for-p

81、rofit hospital in the nearby city of Megaville, the average patient stay is six days(1). Also, the cure rate(2) among patients in the Saluda hospital is about twice(3) that of the Megaville hospital. The Saluda hospital

82、has more employees per patient(5) than the hospital in Megaville, and there are few complaints(6) about service at the local hospital(4). Such data i</p><p>　　The time length of a patient’s stay is not a goo

83、d indication of the quality of treatment in the hospital. (U.C) ★★★★</p><p>　　Other factors might also explain the shorter length of patient stay and higher cure rate in the Saluda hospital. (I.C) ★★★★★</

84、p><p>　　We do not know the severity of illness among patients in the Saluda hospital and in Megaville hospital, thus cannot evaluate the cure rate in the two hospitals. (I.I) ★★★★</p><p>　　More emp

85、loyees per patient and few complaints do not necessarily indicate that treatment in Saluda hospital is better than that in Megaville hospital. (U.C) ★★★★</p><p>　　A higher employee-patient ratio may just ind

86、icate organizational inefficiency at Saluda. (negative evidence) ★★★</p><p>　　Without the total number of patients going to each hospital, we cannot evaluate what percentage of their patients complained. (V.

87、D) ★★★</p><p>　　The author fails to provide the actual expenditures of patients in the two hospitals, thus the assumption that treatment in smaller, nonprofit hospital is more economical is unwarranted. (I.I

88、) ★★</p><p>　　The author hastily generalizes that treatment in other smaller, nonprofit hospitals will necessarily be more economical and of better quality than that in larger, for-profit hospitals. (C.S) ★★

89、★★</p><p>　　nonprofit hospital 論斷：小的非贏利醫(yī)院的治療比大的贏利醫(yī)院更經(jīng)濟質(zhì)量也更好。因為S的非營利醫(yī)院病人的平均住院天數(shù)是兩天，附近M市大的營利醫(yī)院的平均住院天數(shù)是六天。另外，S的療愈率是M的兩倍。S每位醫(yī)生看的病人也比M的多，抱怨也少。 ·前提，治療質(zhì)量。沒有直接的對比數(shù)字，無法得出。提供的住院天數(shù)沒有意義。重病的人一般去大醫(yī)院，而且由于S是非營利的，對資源使用控

90、制并不完全視病情需要，不排除有可能病人沒好就讓人走人。 ·前提，經(jīng)濟。乍一看有可能，因為S不贏利，M贏利，不過如果把治療效果考慮進來，情況就要復雜一些。提供的每位醫(yī)生看病人的比較沒有意義。因為S沒有錢支付更多的人員工資，所以每個人看的病人多，每位病人得到的治療少，但又不能保證醫(yī)生水平會比M高，所以這一點是不被保證的。 ·抱怨，因為不知道兩家醫(yī)院接待病人的情況所以無從比較。另外，S非營利可能，病人也就不抱怨了，或者是窮

91、人，不愿惹麻煩。而M就不一樣了，因為營利，人們對它會挑剔一些。</p><p>　　10. 209, （人事/提議/——）The following recommendation was made by the Human Resources Manager to the board of directors of the Fancy Toy Company.</p><p>　　&quo

92、t;In the last three quarters of this year(1), under the leadership of our president, Pat Salvo, our profits have fallen considerably(2). Thus, we should ask for her resignation in return for a generous severance package.

93、 In Pat's place, we should appoint Rosa Winnings(6,7). Rosa is currently president of Starlight Jewelry(4), a company whose profits have increased dramatically over the past several years(3). Although we will have to

94、 pay Rosa twice the salary that Pat has been receiving, it will b</p><p>　　The manager fails to illustrate that the decreased profits in the last three quarters are not temporary fluctuation but will continu

95、e in the future. (P→F) ★★★</p><p>　　Many other factors could also contribute to the decline in the profits of Fancy Toy Company. (NCR) ★★★★</p><p>　　The manager unfairly attributes the increased

96、 profits of Starlight Jewelry to the leadership of Rosa Winnings. (NCR) ★★★★</p><p>　　Even if Rosa is highly competent in her current position, we could not ensure that she can also do an excellent job as th

97、e manager of the toy company. (F.A) ★★★★</p><p>　　The company’s profits will not necessarily increase merely because the replacement of the manager. (sufficiency of the solution) ★★★★</p><p>　　T

98、he manager fails to consider if Rosa is willing to accept the offer. (feasibility of the conclusion) ★★</p><p>　　The manager fails to inform us if there are any other competent candidates we can choose from.

99、 (necessity of the solution) ★★★</p><p>　　Fancy Toy Company 論斷：我們應任命R，并要求P辭職。因為盡管R的薪水是P的兩倍，但他會使我們的利潤迅速顯著上升。而在過去3個季度里，現(xiàn)任總裁P的領(lǐng)導下，我們的利潤下降明顯。R現(xiàn)在是S珠寶店的頭，這家公司的利潤在過去幾年里一直急劇增加。 ·被忽略的前提，R會來這兒。這兒效益這么不好。 ·前提，