戶籍制度簡(jiǎn)介[外文翻譯]_第1頁(yè)
已閱讀1頁(yè),還剩9頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、<p>  本科畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)(論文)</p><p>  外 文 翻 譯</p><p><b>  原文:</b></p><p>  Guest Editor’s Introduction </p><p>  Zhangtingting</p><p>  The Househo

2、ld Registration System (hukou) was a pivotal institution of political and social control in Maoist China. For more than twenty years, people under this system had no freedom to relocate. Rural-urban migration was particu

3、larly sanctioned. Though unintended, the incursion of economic reform in the late 1970s set in motion a chain of consequences that began the erosion of the hukou system. This issue of Chinese Law and Government presents

4、translations of he selected government regulation</p><p>  To usher in the main body of this issue, I shall briefly examine, in this introduction, the following questions: How did the hukou system come into

5、being? How was it enforced during the Maoist era? What political, social, and economic forces brought about the changes in the hukou system? And what is the future of the hukou system?</p><p>  The Origin an

6、d Significance of the Household Registration</p><p><b>  System</b></p><p>  After 1949, China adopted a centralized command planning system and a Stalinist-type economic development

7、 strategy. Maximizing the industrial output was the major concern of the economic planners. Given its limited financial and economic resources, the Chinese government elected to develop industry at the expense of agricul

8、ture. In order to induce unequal exchanges between industrial and agricultural sectors, the Chinese government had to create, first and foremost, a political mechanism that no</p><p>  The Chinese solution w

9、as the hukou system. On January 9, 1958, the standing committee of the First National People’s Congress passed “Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Residence Registration.” These regulations formally initiat

10、ed a full-blown nationwide hukou system. It required each family in urban areas to register at the public security department and to hold a valid registration booklet. In the booklet, the name, birth date, occupation of

11、each family member, residence of the a</p><p>  China classified nearly 90 percent of the population living in the countryside as agricultural. This segment of the population was not allowed to change their

12、hukou status or to migrate to urban areas. Anyone seeking officially sanctioned rural-urban migration was required to complete a dual-approval process: changing the place of regular hukou registration and converting huko

13、u status from agricultural to nonagricultural (nongzhuanfei). To change the place of a hukou registration and to obtain a</p><p>  Enforcing the Hukou System</p><p>  From its inception, it was

14、apparent that the hukou system could not function on its own. To assist the hukou system in controlling population mobility, collective farms were established throughout China. These farms were bestowed with government a

15、dministrative functions. While the unit of the hukou registration was the household in cities and towns, it was the village in the countryside. Village collectives maintained a single register with the names of all house

16、holds and individuals. Peasants w</p><p>  Meanwhile, a formal urban rationing system was instituted in 1953. State-rationed products covered almost all foodstuffs and other consumer goods from cloth to bicy

17、cles. To purchase the state-owned products, people were required to present ration coupons in addition to the required payment. The allocation of food rations and other consumer goods, as well as social services, were di

18、rectly linked to household registration. Ration coupons were given out only to registered urban residents. Stateowne</p><p>  Could peasants live in cities without urban registration before the economic refo

19、rm? Although travel was occasionally restricted, it was not the main obstacle prohibiting spontaneous migration. The main obstacle was the requirement of urban registration for employment and the supply of basic necessit

20、ies. Without a local hukou, a migrant could not qualify for a job assignment from the government. State employment was the only means of gaining employment before the reforms, because private employm</p><p>

21、  committees, often conducted unannounced house visits on families suspected of housing illegal in-migrants. Hukou, rationing, and danwei formed an effective web in prohibiting unauthorized rural-urban migration in the M

22、aoist era.</p><p>  Changes and Developments in the Hukou System</p><p>  Since the Reform</p><p>  For more than twenty years, the hukou system effectively contained the rural popu

23、lation to where they were born, raised, and assigned. By the time of Mao’s death in 1976, the nation’s traumatic experience in the Cultural Revolution had damaged popular trust in the competence and political virtue of t

24、he Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Serious economic and political crises were evident. According to the CCP, the only way to survive the crises was to take strong action on the economic front.5</p><p>  A cha

25、nge came about in 1979 when the government began limited reforms in the agricultural sector. Each family in the sector was assigned a plot of collective land and signed contracts with the production team, in which they p

26、romised to provide a quantity of crops or services while retaining or selling the remainder on their own. The opening of rural free markets supported the reorganization of agricultural production. The reform at the time

27、was merely intended to stimulate farmers’ production in</p><p>  The effectiveness of the hukou system in controlling migration depended primarily on the proper functioning of the above-mentioned supporting

28、institutions. The weakening of the rationing and work unit system had eroded the previous multilayered control structure on which the hukou system relied for its function. After the economic reforms, the control of job o

29、penings and the daily distribution of necessities were no longer monopolized by the state. Many jobs are now available in the nonstate sec</p><p>  The 1980s and the 1990s witnessed waves of migration from t

30、he countryside to the cities. Surveys conducted in 1994 estimated the floating population in Beijing to be 3.3 million and that of Shanghai to be 3.31million. These numbers represent 31 percent and 25 percent, respective

31、ly,of these two cities’ officially registered population in 1990.8 At the peak of the migration, there were approximately 80 million migrants floating in the entire country. The overall numbers of rural migrants working

32、i</p><p>  The increasing rural mobility has greatly challenged the very basis of the traditional hukou registration system and has forced the government to adjust its policies. The Chinese government has in

33、troduced a series of measures designed to improve the population registration administration under new circumstances. In 1985, a new set of regulations governing temporary residence for workers without a local hukou regi

34、stration was introduced. These regulations stated that people, age sixteen and older</p><p>  Future of the Hukou System</p><p>  The hukou system is both the basis and product of China’s centra

35、lized command economy. In theory, given the complexity of this system and its interconnectedness with so many other social and economic control mechanisms, its demise will come about slowly after a more thorough and fund

36、amental restructuring of Chinese society. However, what has happened in the last twenty years in China has already exceeded what theory may have predicted. The web of watertight social control has already been effect<

37、/p><p>  Source:Zhangtingting,Chinese Law and Government, vol. 34, no. 3, May/June 2001, </p><p>  譯文: 戶籍制度簡(jiǎn)介</p><p><b>  張婷婷</b></p><p>  在毛澤東時(shí)

38、代戶籍制度(戶口)是政治的一個(gè)關(guān)鍵制度。而超過(guò)二十多年的時(shí)間里,人們?cè)谶@個(gè)系統(tǒng)下沒(méi)有搬遷的自由。(戶籍制度)尤其制裁城鄉(xiāng)遷移。雖然感到意外,19世紀(jì)70年代后期經(jīng)濟(jì)改革的侵入對(duì)遷移產(chǎn)生一系列的后果,從那時(shí)開(kāi)始便侵蝕戶口系統(tǒng)。</p><p>  這個(gè)法律與政府的問(wèn)題表現(xiàn)在政府規(guī)定選擇、指令類、戶口系統(tǒng)管理改革前后的轉(zhuǎn)換。第一部分包含戶口制度相關(guān)概念以及官方解釋登記程序。第二部分包括二項(xiàng)規(guī)則表現(xiàn)在1958年一個(gè)大圖

39、結(jié)構(gòu)的戶口注冊(cè)改革之前的“中華人民共和國(guó)注冊(cè)”和“轉(zhuǎn)讓為干部和工人流動(dòng)住所的機(jī)構(gòu)注冊(cè)過(guò)戶手續(xù)。” 第三部分介紹新的條例下對(duì)日漸擴(kuò)大的人口流動(dòng)改革,包括“中華人民共和國(guó)身份住所條例”、“臨時(shí)住所卡申請(qǐng)條例”和“公安管理租金和租約收容條例”。這些條例清楚明白地顯示出發(fā)生在戶口系統(tǒng)的變動(dòng)和未來(lái)。</p><p>  引進(jìn)這個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)問(wèn)題,我應(yīng)該簡(jiǎn)要地介紹下面的問(wèn)題:戶口制度是如何形成的?在毛澤東時(shí)代是怎樣執(zhí)行的? 是什么政

40、治、社會(huì)的、經(jīng)濟(jì)的力量導(dǎo)致變戶口制度的變動(dòng)?戶口制度的未來(lái)是什么?</p><p>  戶籍制度的來(lái)源和意義</p><p>  1949以后,中國(guó)采取一個(gè)中央集中命令計(jì)劃體制,一個(gè)國(guó)家集體經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略。經(jīng)濟(jì)計(jì)劃者主要關(guān)注工業(yè)產(chǎn)值的最大化。中國(guó)政府選擇發(fā)展工業(yè),給它的限制金融、經(jīng)濟(jì)資源,由農(nóng)業(yè)負(fù)擔(dān)。為了促使工業(yè)和農(nóng)業(yè)部門(mén)之間不平等的交流,中國(guó)政府不得不創(chuàng)建這個(gè)制度:一種不僅人為地把工業(yè)和農(nóng)

41、業(yè)、城市和農(nóng)村分開(kāi)的政治機(jī)制,而且阻止自由資源流動(dòng),包括勞工。</p><p>  中國(guó)的解決方法是戶口制度。在1958年1月9日,第一次全國(guó)人民代表大會(huì)常務(wù)委員會(huì)通過(guò)《中華人民共和國(guó)戶口登記條例》。這些條例正式開(kāi)始全面的全國(guó)戶口制度。它要求每家庭在城市地區(qū)登記在公安部門(mén),登記一個(gè)有效注冊(cè)小冊(cè)子。在小冊(cè)子中記載著姓名、出生日期、占用的每家庭成員、家庭的住所、家庭狀況(農(nóng)業(yè)或非農(nóng))。</p><

42、p>  中國(guó)將生活在鄉(xiāng)村的那些近90%的人口劃分為農(nóng)業(yè)人口。這些人口不允許改變他們的戶口或遷移市區(qū)。任何人尋求城鄉(xiāng)遷移必須完成一個(gè)進(jìn)程:改變定期的地方戶口注冊(cè)和戶口地位從農(nóng)業(yè)到非農(nóng)。改變地方的一個(gè)戶口注冊(cè),獲得一個(gè)遷移許可證,申請(qǐng)人被要求出示適當(dāng)?shù)墓矙C(jī)關(guān)證明。 申請(qǐng)者必須符合“政策”和“配額”(指標(biāo))管理。這個(gè)過(guò)程常常極其困難。</p><p><b>  執(zhí)行戶口系統(tǒng)</b><

43、;/p><p>  從一開(kāi)始,戶籍制度的功能就明顯的表現(xiàn)在其他方面:協(xié)助控制人口的可能流動(dòng)性,在整個(gè)中國(guó)建立集體農(nóng)場(chǎng)。這些農(nóng)場(chǎng)擁有同政府行政一樣的功能。家在城鎮(zhèn)的是城市戶口,在鄉(xiāng)村的是農(nóng)村戶口。所有家庭和個(gè)體必須在村集體登記,為集體日常工作。如果需要遷移,必須得到村里的同意。如果外出,將收到村里的介紹信——作為外出時(shí)的一個(gè)身份證。1956年完成農(nóng)場(chǎng)部門(mén)的集體化,掛鉤戶口制度。這保證一個(gè)縣對(duì)鄉(xiāng)村農(nóng)民的高度控制。<

44、/p><p>  與此同時(shí),1953年正式實(shí)行城市配給制。配給產(chǎn)品覆蓋幾乎所有的食品、其他消費(fèi)品:從布到自行車(chē)。采購(gòu)國(guó)有產(chǎn)品,除配給優(yōu)惠券之外還要求付款。食物配給的分配,其他消費(fèi)品,以及社會(huì)服務(wù),直接鏈接戶籍。國(guó)有的工作單位負(fù)責(zé)分發(fā)配給優(yōu)惠券,只發(fā)給城市居民。此外,一個(gè)單位也提供的住房,兒童教育,保健,運(yùn)輸,電影劇院等。一些能在城市中心區(qū)謀生的農(nóng)民沒(méi)有政府分配工作,但由于發(fā)放,單位,平均(生活水平),享有一個(gè)遠(yuǎn)勝于農(nóng)

45、村生活標(biāo)準(zhǔn),他們還是選擇留在城市。</p><p>  在經(jīng)濟(jì)改革前,沒(méi)有城市戶口的農(nóng)民住在城市盡管被限制旅行,但它(戶籍制度)不是禁止自由遷移的主要障礙。主要障礙是城市的需求登記為雇用,基本的的輸送需要。沒(méi)有本地戶口,一個(gè)外來(lái)者沒(méi)有資格從政府分配工作。唯一獲得國(guó)家的雇用在改革前,因?yàn)樗饺说墓陀貌淮嬖?。任何一個(gè)工作單位,想不引起注意下就獲得收容是不可能的。甚至就業(yè),收容可用的,它的困難獲得在于由于糧食、肉類、蔬菜

46、,因?yàn)檫@些被配給城市居民。此外,維持治安組織,例如本地公安局、居委會(huì),常常進(jìn)行未經(jīng)宣布就進(jìn)入某人家庭。懷疑非法收容。在毛澤東時(shí)代,戶口,發(fā)放,單位形成一個(gè)有效卷筒紙的禁止擅自城鄉(xiāng)遷移。</p><p>  戶口制度改革以來(lái)的變動(dòng)、發(fā)展</p><p>  而超過(guò)二十多年,戶口制度有效地包含農(nóng)村人口。到1976年毛澤東去世的時(shí)候?yàn)橹?,文化革命的?jīng)歷已經(jīng)損害了受歡迎的、被信任的中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的優(yōu)勢(shì)

47、(中共)。嚴(yán)重的經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題,政治的危機(jī)明顯,據(jù)中共所說(shuō),必經(jīng)之路存在強(qiáng)烈經(jīng)濟(jì)陣線。</p><p>  1979年,政府開(kāi)始有限的在農(nóng)業(yè)部門(mén)進(jìn)行改革。每家庭簽訂合同同生產(chǎn)隊(duì),他們承諾提供一些作物或服務(wù)從而保留或出售他們的其余。鄉(xiāng)村的自由市場(chǎng)支持農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)的重組。改革當(dāng)時(shí)只是打算刺激農(nóng)民'生產(chǎn)。然而,其中抱怨城市居民配給制的人創(chuàng)建很多產(chǎn)品自由市場(chǎng)。在配給制下,在交貨時(shí)時(shí)常推遲,輸送的常常是低質(zhì)量,而且形式單調(diào)。

48、改革給予人們自由市場(chǎng)上貨源充足的肉類、副食品以后使得配給制成為更不受歡迎的。第一改變的跡象出現(xiàn)在1980s早期,當(dāng)貨源充足的肉類、副食品食品在自由市場(chǎng)破壞了官方配給優(yōu)惠券。在1980s中期,配給優(yōu)惠券正式停止使用。對(duì)于1980s后期,肉類等其他消費(fèi)品的配給券漸漸取消。廢除的配給制動(dòng)搖單位系統(tǒng)的根本。城市的的人不再依靠他們的工作單位為配給優(yōu)惠券。人民隨便從一處遷至另一處,只要他們可以在生存需要在市場(chǎng)上賺錢(qián)謀生。與此同時(shí),私營(yíng)部門(mén)提供城市勞

49、動(dòng)力更大自由選擇,或者調(diào)動(dòng)工作。第一步采取行將到來(lái)的自由化,在十年之內(nèi),配給制被取消。進(jìn)一步,自從改革以來(lái),工作單位制也被嚴(yán)重削弱。</p><p>  戶口制度能有效地控制遷移主要依靠上述正常工作機(jī)構(gòu)的援助。配給制度和工作單位制的削弱已經(jīng)侵蝕了多層控制結(jié)構(gòu),而戶口制度依靠它的功能。在經(jīng)濟(jì)改革后,控制職位空缺,每日的分配的必要性不再被國(guó)家壟斷?,F(xiàn)在多工作在非國(guó)家部門(mén)是可能的,幾乎所有的日用品都在市場(chǎng)上。國(guó)家資助福

50、利對(duì)城市居民已經(jīng)是急劇減少。比起履行社會(huì)的監(jiān)視,街道辦事處更感興趣是賺錢(qián)。這些機(jī)構(gòu)的援助,戶口制度不再限制農(nóng)村人口。1980s,1990s出現(xiàn)從農(nóng)村到城市遷移的潮流。1994年北京流動(dòng)人口估計(jì)是330萬(wàn),上海的331萬(wàn)。這些數(shù)目分別代表這些二個(gè)城市1990'正式地戶籍人口的百分之31和百分之25。在高峰遷移時(shí)期,有約8000萬(wàn)人口在整個(gè)國(guó)家流動(dòng)。</p><p>  加大鄉(xiāng)村的流動(dòng)性對(duì)傳統(tǒng)戶口登記制度具有

51、非常的挑戰(zhàn)性,迫使政府調(diào)整了它的政策。中國(guó)政府介紹了一系列改善人口注冊(cè)管理新的措施計(jì)劃。1985年,發(fā)布了《關(guān)于城鎮(zhèn)暫住人口管理的暫行規(guī)定》。這些條例聲明,年齡十六以上的。打算繼續(xù)留在城市地區(qū)超過(guò)三月,除了他們的地方的戶口注冊(cè),必須申請(qǐng)暫住證。據(jù)公安部估計(jì),其中的流動(dòng)人口有8000萬(wàn)1995年,只有4400萬(wàn)被登記作為臨時(shí)的居民。許多農(nóng)移民簡(jiǎn)單地規(guī)避規(guī)則,不向公安機(jī)關(guān)登記。與此同時(shí),全國(guó)構(gòu)建照片識(shí)別系統(tǒng),它的用改變了戶籍管理的單位注冊(cè)。

52、在改革前,單位平均每戶一本書(shū)在城鎮(zhèn),每村一本書(shū)在鄉(xiāng)村?,F(xiàn)在,每個(gè)人都有不區(qū)別戶口地位的身份證。這新方法,更好的訴訟新的人口流動(dòng)的環(huán)境,反映了國(guó)家成千上萬(wàn)農(nóng)民事實(shí)上的移民,戶口制度的失敗。</p><p><b>  戶口制度的未來(lái)</b></p><p>  戶口制度是中國(guó)的基礎(chǔ)和產(chǎn)品的集中指令經(jīng)濟(jì)。在理論上,特定的復(fù)雜的這個(gè)系統(tǒng),它同其他社會(huì)的、經(jīng)濟(jì)控制機(jī)制相互關(guān)聯(lián)

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論