版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、廣西師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文立法語(yǔ)言規(guī)范化研究姓名:祝坤伶申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):法理學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:@20090401廣西師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文 IIStudy on the standardization of legislative language Abstract Author □□□ Supervisor Prof. □□□ Specialty Jurisprudence Research direction Marxism
2、Jurisprudence Grade 2006 Since last century, law researchers began to pay their attention to language, Hart used the theory of philosophy of language in his study and found a self-build kingdom of the law. “Linguistic t
3、urn“ points a new path - the path of linguistics to the researchers after Hart, they started to analysis the relationship between law and language, and theory of the Legal language was born. The study of legislative lang
4、uage of our country began at the end of 70's and early 80's in the 20th century, it’s basic on the system of Linguistics and build a system of legislative language step by step. It focus on the following three as
5、pects:1. Introduce the situation of foreign study, Introduce the origin, the development and its main content of legal language from a macro point;2. The ontology of Legislative language, which analysis the legislative l
6、anguage on the framework of the Linguistics system;3. Practical application of the legal language, discuss specific applications of the Legal language on legislative, judicial, and legal enforcement. The theory of pragma
7、tics and semantics attracts more and more scholars’ concern as the in-depth study, and it seems that the legislative language study towards at the direction of pragmatics and semantics. Study the legislative language bas
8、e on Wittgenstein and Austin’s theory of Day-to-day behavior from the perspective of pragmatics and semantics. But it isn’t the fundamental solution to the non-standard of legislative language, though it has made some ac
9、hievements like the dialectical recognize between uncertainty and ambiguity, the interaction of the two and affirmation of Vagueness words, etc. This paper analysis the standardization of the legislative language begin w
10、ith the basic component ,both in legal and empirical sides, and try to find a linguistic path to the good law. Analytical method is one of the methods commonly used in legal language research. This paper selects the typi
11、cal judicial cases from the official laws and regulations, newspapers and magazines. Then come to discussion of the legislative language basic on the analysis of its Characteristics of words, sentence and style. This art
12、icle includes three parts: introduction, main subject and the conclusion. The introduction is mainly to tell that the standardization of the legislative language is the linguistic path to the good law, by introduce the S
13、ignificance of the topic, the main content and the writing methods. There are five chapters in the main subject. The first chapter including the connotation and legal value of the legislative language, and the following
14、three chapters discuss the non-standard of legislative language by analysis its basic composition of the current legal texts. The fifth chapter is about the methods of the standardization of legislative language, the dis
15、cussion expands around technical standards, the quality of legislators and the systems. The conclusion is the outline of the whole paper. Key words: legislative language; words; sentence; style of legislative language
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 立法語(yǔ)言的規(guī)范化
- 立法語(yǔ)言規(guī)范化的研究.pdf
- 網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)言規(guī)范化研究.pdf
- 網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)言規(guī)范化
- 立法背景資料的規(guī)范化研究.pdf
- 現(xiàn)代立法語(yǔ)言用詞研究.pdf
- 立法語(yǔ)言的模糊性.pdf
- 語(yǔ)言文字規(guī)范化試題
- 語(yǔ)言文字規(guī)范化論文
- 語(yǔ)言文字規(guī)范化常識(shí)
- 語(yǔ)言文字規(guī)范化制度
- 語(yǔ)言學(xué)術(shù)語(yǔ)漢譯規(guī)范化研究.pdf
- 試論法律語(yǔ)言的規(guī)范化.pdf
- 語(yǔ)言文字規(guī)范化知識(shí)題
- 語(yǔ)言文字規(guī)范化知識(shí)問卷
- 語(yǔ)言文字規(guī)范化知識(shí)材料
- 語(yǔ)言文字規(guī)范化教學(xué)-論文
- 2018語(yǔ)言文字規(guī)范化常識(shí)
- 語(yǔ)言文字規(guī)范化特色材料
- 立法語(yǔ)言中的“的”字短語(yǔ)研究.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論