體育教育訓(xùn)練學(xué)專(zhuān)業(yè)研究生教學(xué)能力評(píng)價(jià)體系構(gòu)建及實(shí)證研究.pdf

1、體育教育訓(xùn)練學(xué)專(zhuān)業(yè)研究生教學(xué)能力評(píng)價(jià)體系構(gòu)建及實(shí)證研究論文隨機(jī)驗(yàn)證編號(hào)：BT5143310303370V ABSTRACT Society's high standards of quality of talent, high demand has become stronger, increasing emphasis on the major universities of the quality of

2、the training of qualified talents and ability level,but graduate as higher personnel on behalf of its degree is concerned evidently.The Education Graduate China's high level of development of teachers, a key reserv

3、e forces, and the the reserve teachers teaching ability is an imp- ortant part of the evaluation is in Colleges and professional teaching quality manage- ment, were important for the strengthening of the rese

4、rve teachers teaching capacity and improve the quality of our teaching significance and positive role. How scientific, objective, comprehensive, fair and impartial evaluation of graduate teaching ability is of gr

5、eat significance for the master and screening the graduate teaching ability levels, to improve the teaching quality of college high-level personnel, to ensure the full realization of the objectives of t

6、he personnel training. Therefore, various colleges and universities in building science, teaching ability evaluation system. To reduce the subjective evaluation results to ensure that scientific and accurate calcul

7、ation of the evaluation results, the paper AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation wears combined use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to establish the evaluation system of teaching ability hiera

8、rchical relationships, at the same time were calculated for each indicators operator accounting for the weight value, graduate teaching ability evaluation system includes expert teacher evaluation system, student evalua

9、tion system, intern selfevaluation system of three subsystems, namely the use of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to establish evaluation model. The evaluation results obtained through empirical calculation based

10、on the evaluation model, the evaluation results to the overall analysis of the situation of teaching ability, and can also be a single analysis of various indicators. The evaluation results show that: (1) internship gr

11、aduate teaching organization and management capacity of each index is generally weaker, especially classroom organization. (2) For the student evaluation, student more need practice teachers strong language ski

12、lls. 體育教育訓(xùn)練學(xué)專(zhuān)業(yè)研究生教學(xué)能力評(píng)價(jià)體系構(gòu)建及實(shí)證研究論文隨機(jī)驗(yàn)證編號(hào)：BT5143310303370- 1 - 目錄 目錄 1 前言 ................................................... 3 1.1 選題依據(jù) .................................................... 3 1.2 研究目的及意義 ..............

13、................................ 4 1.2.1 研究目的： ............................................. 4 1.2.2 研究意義： ............................................. 4 2 國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀 ......................................... 4 2.1 相

14、關(guān)概念界定 ................................................ 4 2.1.1 教學(xué)能力 ............................................... 5 2.1.2 評(píng)價(jià)與教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià) ......................................... 6 2.2 教學(xué)能力相關(guān)研究 ..........................

15、.................. 7 2.2.1 教學(xué)能力結(jié)構(gòu)相關(guān)研究 ................................... 7 2.2.2 教學(xué)能力培養(yǎng)相關(guān)研究 ................................... 7 2.2.3 教學(xué)能力評(píng)價(jià)相關(guān)研究 ................................... 7 2.3 前人研究的不足 ...............

16、............................... 8 3 研究對(duì)象及方法 ......................................... 9 3.1 研究對(duì)象 ................................................... 10 3.2 研究方法 ................................................... 10

17、3.2.1 研究流程 .............................................. 10 3.2.2 問(wèn)卷調(diào)查法 ............................................ 11 3.2.3 訪(fǎng)談法 ................................................ 14 3.2.4 數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)法 ..................