論巨額財(cái)產(chǎn)來源不明罪中的“不能說明來源”.pdf

1、學(xué)位論文獨(dú)創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明：所提交的學(xué)位論文是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下進(jìn)行的研究工作和取得的研究成果。本論文中除引文外，所有實(shí)驗(yàn)、數(shù)據(jù)和有關(guān)材料均是真實(shí)的。本論文中除引文和致謝的內(nèi)容外，不包含其他人或其它機(jī)構(gòu)已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的研究成果。其他同志對(duì)本研究所做的貢獻(xiàn)均已在論文中作了聲明并表示了謝意。學(xué)位論文作褂：：攀坪日期：∥厶∥學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)聲明研究生在校攻讀學(xué)位期間論文工作的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)單位屬南京師范大學(xué)。學(xué)校有權(quán)保存本學(xué)位論文的電子和紙質(zhì)文

2、檔，可以借閱或上網(wǎng)公布本學(xué)位論文的部分或全部內(nèi)容，可以采用影印、復(fù)印等手段保存、匯編本學(xué)位論文。學(xué)校可以向國家有關(guān)機(jī)關(guān)或機(jī)構(gòu)送交論文的電子和紙質(zhì)文檔，允許論文被查閱和借閱。(保密論文在解密后遵守此規(guī)定)保密論文注釋：本學(xué)位論文屬于保密論文，密級(jí)：叢過保1密期限為——年。學(xué)位論文作者簽名：日期：4獺岫、≯|《℃、諺指導(dǎo)教師簽名：日期：F弘名W。三AbstractAbstractThecrimeofhugeunidentifiedprope

3、rtyassecuritychargesinChina’Scriminallawthecrimeofcorruptionandbriberychapterbecauseofthecountsofdescriptionisnotprecise，legalpunishmentandcorruptionandbriberycrimelegalpunishmentfarandotherreasons，sinceitscreationattheb

4、eginningofthepraiseandcriticism，thereisa”corruptioncrimeweapon”and”corruptofficialshaven”disputeInordertosolvetheembarrassmentofthetheory，andrealityofthecrime，thisarticleto”Can’texplainsource”inthiscrimecorrectpositionin

5、gasthebreakthroughpointbyoverallanalysisofitsparentholdingahugeamountofpropertywithunidentifiedsources，thatthevalueofthiscrimelegislationandthezerotoleranceagainstcorruptioncriminalpolicydeterminesthebehaviorwayofthecrim

6、eCanonlyisholdingahugeamountofpropertyfromunidentifiedsourcesAstheholderofanecessarysupplementtothecrime，crimeisalegalpresumptionofcrime，legislativejudicialorgansinaccordancewithhasidentifiednationalstaffholdsignificantl

7、ymorethanthelegitimateincomeandthedifferenceishugepropertywhichisthebasicfacts，andthedefendantwasnotthatthesourceofthedifferenceishugepropertyaccordingtotheexperienceruleandlogicruleofpresumptionofthepropertyisillegalinc

8、omeIncludingthepresumptionof”presumptionofillegalincome”andthesubjective”knowingly”Presumptionofcrimeasweighingtheprosandconsofthestrategicchoiceoftheutilitarianlegislationmodemustbetoreducetoaminimumthesacrificeofthefai

9、rvalue，namelyinordertoavoidwronginganinnocent，SOinthedesignofthelawleftamechanismofcrime，thatis，aslongasthenationalstafftoexplaintheestablishmentofthedifferencebetweenthepropertyofthesourceresistanceisthepresumptionThere

10、fore，”cannotexplainthesourceofproperty”inthecrimeofobstructingthelegalpresumptionistypeofcrimejustification”Cant’thatincludesrefusedtosayafalsenoteandsayandtheunknowntype；asthecrimeisinthechapterofcriminallawinChapter8，t

11、hecrimeofcorruptionandbriberycharges，whichdeterminesthecannotexplainthecontentonlyisnotahugeamountofpropertyisnotderivedfromcorruptionandbriberycrimeincome；propertysourcesthatneedtobeenoughtomakethejudgmentthatisexplaine

12、dbythefactthatmorethanhalfoftheproofdegree；thefunctionofsafeguardinghumanrightsofcriminallawdeterminestheshouldnotbelimitedtothedescriptionofthenumberandtimeThecorrectdefinitionof”Cannotexplainthesource”ofthiscrimeiSthep