版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、 1Abstract Although the criminal law of the People's Republic of China(1997) abolished the system of analogy, the discussion on the analogy interpretation favorable to the defendant is still of great significance. Th
2、e current situation of China's criminal law circles is: the viewpoint of allowing analogy interpretation favorable to the defendant holds the superiority in the criminal theorists' realm, but the judicial practic
3、al realm is actually not willing to admit this viewpoint, still regardes it as taboo. Writing this article is to change the error view, impel the criminal judicial world to carry on the analogy interpretation favorable t
4、o the defendant, so as to play its due performance. In view of the fact that concepts' use related to “analogy“ is not unified and full of confusion, the first part of this article differentiates and analyzes the cor
5、relative concepts, just as the system of analogy, analogy application, analogy interpretation, analogical reasoning and ways of thinking by analogy, and thus clarifies the real meaning of the analogy interpretation which
6、 is a legal creation to a great extent. The second part inspects the attitudes of the main representatives of civil law countries and common law countries, and then knows the viewpoint of allowing analogy interpretation
7、favorable to the defendant is a strong advocate in many countries including China,which is approved of by many criminal scholars. The third part demonstrates the valid foundation of the analogy interpretation favorable t
8、o the defendant from seven aspects, and proves it is accordant with the principle of legality, social security function of criminal law, the modesty and restraint of criminal law, and the criminal policy of combining len
9、iency with rigidity, and it also conforms to the development trend of interpretation of criminal law which is from Rulism to Humanilism. The fourth part of the article discusses the operation mechanism and application sc
10、ope of the analogy interpretation in favor of the defendant, and thoughts its operation mechanism includes three closely connected links: the confirmation of the criminal law crack, the existence of the similar criminal
11、law article which can be cited, and the similarity's comparison between the case type and the criminal rule type. As for the application scope, the analogy interpretation favorable to the defendant can be applied to
12、all criminal cases, and it is irreplaceable. The fifth part studies the reasonable control on the analogy interpretation favorable to the defendant from substantial and procedural aspects. In addition to the general requ
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 論存疑有利被告原則的適用.pdf
- 論刑事司法中的類推解釋.pdf
- 論刑法中類推解釋與擴(kuò)張解釋的界限
- 論存疑有利于被告人原則.pdf
- 刑法中的類推解釋問題研究.pdf
- 刑法類推解釋方法之分析
- 論刑法中擴(kuò)張解釋與類推解釋的界限——以張某致住宿學(xué)生死傷案為例.pdf
- 論刑事被告的質(zhì)證權(quán)
- 論我國《保險(xiǎn)法》中的有利解釋規(guī)則.pdf
- 論刑事被告人的證明責(zé)任.pdf
- 論刑事被告人的質(zhì)證權(quán).pdf
- 論被告人認(rèn)罪程序的完善.pdf
- 論刑法解釋的立場——以形式解釋論和實(shí)質(zhì)解釋論為視角.pdf
- 論有利被追訴人原則.pdf
- 論刑事被告人閱卷權(quán).pdf
- 論民事撤訴制度中被告權(quán)利的保障.pdf
- 論被告人死亡的刑事再審程序.pdf
- 論共同被告人陳述.pdf
- 論民事訴訟被告答辯制度的完善.pdf
- 單位被告參與刑事訴訟方式研究——兼論單位被告缺席審判的訴訟價(jià)值.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論