“行動生活”與“沉思生活”之間——阿倫特“政治地思考”之見.pdf

1、蘭州大學碩士學位論文“行動生活”與“沉思生活”之間——阿倫特“政治地思考”之見姓名：周易申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：哲學外國哲學指導教師：陳春文20090501蘭州大學碩士學位論文“行動生活”與“沉思生活”之間——阿倫特“政治地思考”之見AbstractManyphilosophershavemadethedistinctionbetween“vitaaction’’and“vitacontemplativa“SincefromPlato，

2、philosophersgenerallyagreedthat“vitacontemplativa’’isbetterthan‘‘vitaaction“Theythinkthattheformeristheactionofselfcontainedandforthepurposeofitsown；thelatterisonlyameanstoanend，whichdoesnothaveintrinsicvalueThesignifica

3、nceofArendt’Sthinkingistoreexaminethe‘‘vitaaction’’and“vitacontemplativa“shebelievedthatthinkingwasimportant，butthethinkingandtheactionarenotdecisivelyantagonisticArendtreestablishedthedignityfor“vitaaction“anddidnotSCCi

4、tasmerelyameans，butthesurvivalofhumaninadifferentwayPeoplewillfallintolostwiththelackofthinking，butwithoutaction，thesignificanceashumanwillnolongerexistOfcourse，Arendt’understandingaboutthinkingandactionwasnotinthetradit

5、ionalSCNSC，butsubvertedthedichotomyofessenceandphenomenonArendtrecognizedthedifferenceofthetwolife—styles，herwokewasjusttoclarifyAfterthetrialeventofEichmann，Arendtawaredthatpeoplereliedonideologyratherthanthinkingundert

6、heruleofhupocriticalpoliticsNotonlydowetakeactiontobuildthepublicdomain，buttothinkandjudgeThus，Arendtinhislateryearsreturnedtospirituallifeofhuman，shetriedtoexploresomekindofabridgelinking“vitaaction”and“vitacontemplativ