版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、 Alena Andrejovská and Veronika Puliková / Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Vol. 14, No. 1 (2018), 133-141 133‘ ‘ Tax Revenues in the Context of Economic Determinants Tax Revenues in the Context of Economic
2、 Determinants ALENA ANDREJOVSKÁ1 and VERONIKA PULIKOVÁ2 1 Associate Professor, PhD, Department of Humanities, Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Ko?ice, Slovak Republic, e-mail: alena.andreovska@tuk
3、e.sk 2 Graduate, Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Ko?ice, Slovak Republic, e-mail: veronika.pulikova@tuke.sk ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received December 12, 2017 Revised from January 21, 2018 Accepted Februar
4、y 24, 2018 Available online March 15, 2018 Despite the general recognition that taxes are generally a strong po- licy tool for assessing the macroeconomic impact of the country's al- ternative tax policies, taxes ar
5、e often weakened by restrictions on tax revenue measurement. The aim of the contribution is to quantify the impact of selected macroeconomic indicators (gross domestic product, level of employment, public debt, foreig
6、n direct invest- ments, effective tax rate, statutory tax rate) on the total amount of tax revenues, taking into account the tax competitiveness of the 28 EU member states. There was used methods of three models of reg
7、- ression analysis: the pooling model, the fixed effects model and the random effects model. The hypothesis that the gross domestic pro- duct has the greatest impact on tax revenue has been tested. In conclusion, the a
8、nalysis confirmed that the strongest correlation is between tax revenues and employment rate. Followed by foreign di- rect investment and gross domestic product. Increasing these deter- minants by 1 mil. € (increase in
9、employment by 1%) would increase tax revenues by 10 072 mil. € at the employment rate, by 383.1 thousand € for gross domestic product and by 434.2 thousand € for foreign direct investment. JEL classificationJEL classi
10、fication: H21, H25. DOI: DOI: 10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-1.10 Keywords Keywords: tax competition, corporate taxation, tax revenue, capital mobility INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Corporate taxes represent the driv
11、ing force of the economy which makes individual countries more attractive for investment. It helps creating new jobs and ultimately increase welfare in the country and brings sufficient tax revenues to national budgets
12、. However, it is not easy to determine its optimal level. Lower taxes attract investors, but higher taxes bring higher revenues to national budgets. Even when high taxes are linked to tax avoidance. When assessing corp
13、orate taxes at European Union level, it has to be said that despite the existence of free trade and the common currency, there are 28 different tax systems with different levels of corporate taxation. Govern- ments hav
14、e to seriously address the issue of tax harmonization and coordination of EU tax policies to maintain economic progress and stability. There is a contradiction. On the one hand, it is the duty of the Member States to c
15、omply with the legal norms and acts in force in the EU. On the other Montenegrin Journal of Economics Vol. 14, No. 1 (2018), 133-141 Alena Andrejovská and Veronika Puliková / Montenegrin Journal of Economics,
16、 Vol. 14, No. 1 (2018), 133-141 135ing variable and so nominal GDP. The result of the analysis is the fact that growth of profit in moni- tored time was direct proportionally equal with tempo of GDP growth. They conclud
17、e that tempo of increase of tax revenue shouldn´t significantly overstep the tem- po of GDP growth. The influence of GDP on revenue of corporate tax by the means of different analysis examined more authors: Kub
18、5;tová and ?íhová (2009), Bayer (2011), Bánociová and Pav- líková (2013), Simionescu et al. (2016), Karnitis and Karnitis (2017). Through panel regression analysis, the positive bilate
19、ral relationship between GDP and tax revenues was claimed. The research results suggest that demographic change in the EU countries is affecting tax rev- enues (Goudswaard and van de Kar (1994), Al-Mamun, Entebang, Mans
20、or and Yasser (2014), Hasseldine (1999), Devos (2008), Felix and Watkins (2013). Total tax revenue will increase with the overall population growth in most countries. According to Goudswaard and van de Kar (1994), tax
21、 revenues will increase with population growth and an increase of the relatively older workforce. His forecasts indicate that after 2030 revenues will decline as a result of the declining population and the rapidly agi
22、ng population. Kennedy, McMillen and Simmons (2015) point to the positive relationship between employ- ment growth and revenues from corporate tax. At the same time, they point out that the high level of unemployment i
23、s in a negative correlation with the tax rate, so governments have to stimulate the economy at a time of economic downturn with lower tax rates. Schwellnuss and Arnold (2008) assess the impact of the negative dependenc
24、e between domestic and foreign investment and the corporate tax rate. This negative dependence was also confirmed at the industrial level. An im- portant role was played by the specific tax rate for corporations. The h
25、igher the corporate tax rate is, the more negative is its impact on the future growth of the investment. A similar view is expressed by Abbabs and Klemm (2012), who note that excessive tax increases, which are linked t
26、o the increase in tax revenues, reduce the inflow of foreign investment and vice versa. The lower rates mean the increase the inflow of foreign investment. The state budget and the public debt balance are other macroec
27、onomic indicators that monitor the govern- ment's ability to effectively manage state budget resources and have a direct impact on the state's fiscal policy (Dráb and Mihóková, 2013). Impact on d
28、ebt, tax systems, primary expenditures and tax competition was given by Krogstrup (2002) as part of the European Central Bank study. He focused on the causality between tax bur- den and fiscal imbalance. Osterloh and He
29、inemann (2013) concluded that other socio-economic and geographic factors form the support of the minimum corporate tax at member state level are also important. These factors included political affiliation, individual
30、 characteristics and education- al level as well as national interests. 1. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 1. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 1.1 Regression Analysis 1.1 Regression Analysis The aim of the submission is to monitor the infl
31、uence of macroeconomic determinants on the amount of tax revenues. Conducted analysis quantified the influence of chosen indicators on gross amount of tax revenues for 28 member states of European Union. Data was struc
32、tured as panel data from Eurostat data base (2015) and analysis was conducted in statistical program SAS Enter- prise Guide 7.1 Davis (2007). Considering the significant differences in macroeconomic markers between the
33、 countries, the analysis was conducted specifically for 5 economically most advanced countries (Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain) and specially for 23 countries (Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Netherl
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- [雙語翻譯]經(jīng)濟學(xué)專業(yè)公司稅外文翻譯—經(jīng)濟決定因素背景下的稅收收入
- [雙語翻譯]經(jīng)濟學(xué)專業(yè)公司稅外文翻譯—經(jīng)濟決定因素背景下的稅收收入(原文).PDF
- [雙語翻譯]經(jīng)濟學(xué)專業(yè)公司稅外文翻譯—經(jīng)濟決定因素背景下的稅收收入.DOCX
- [雙語翻譯]經(jīng)濟學(xué)專業(yè)公司稅外文翻譯—經(jīng)濟決定因素背景下的稅收收入中英全
- 2018年經(jīng)濟學(xué)專業(yè)公司稅外文翻譯—經(jīng)濟決定因素背景下的稅收收入(原文).PDF
- 2018年經(jīng)濟學(xué)專業(yè)公司稅外文翻譯—經(jīng)濟決定因素背景下的稅收收入
- 2018年經(jīng)濟學(xué)專業(yè)公司稅外文翻譯—經(jīng)濟決定因素背景下的稅收收入.DOCX
- 計量經(jīng)濟學(xué)論文-中國稅收收入的影響因素
- 我國稅收收入超常增長的經(jīng)濟學(xué)分析.pdf
- 計量經(jīng)濟學(xué)論文-影響中國稅收收入增長的主要原因
- [雙語翻譯]財務(wù)績效外文翻譯--羅馬尼亞企業(yè)財務(wù)績效的經(jīng)濟決定因素
- 云南省稅收收入與經(jīng)濟增長的分析
- [雙語翻譯]股權(quán)投資外文翻譯—風(fēng)險投資和私募股權(quán)融資是經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵決定因素(原文)
- [雙語翻譯]--外文翻譯--行為經(jīng)濟學(xué)和宏觀經(jīng)濟模型
- [雙語翻譯]物流外包外文翻譯--快遞公司運輸外包戰(zhàn)略的決定因素(節(jié)選)
- [雙語翻譯]共享經(jīng)濟外文翻譯—透視共享經(jīng)濟(原文)
- [雙語翻譯]財務(wù)績效外文翻譯--羅馬尼亞企業(yè)財務(wù)績效的經(jīng)濟決定因素中英全
- 我國稅收收入的影響因素分析
- [雙語翻譯]物流外包外文翻譯--快遞公司運輸外包戰(zhàn)略的決定因素(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]共享經(jīng)濟外文翻譯—透視共享經(jīng)濟(原文).PDF
評論
0/150
提交評論