反壟斷公益訴訟若干法律問題研究.pdf

1、湖南大學碩士學位論文反壟斷公益訴訟若干法律問題研究姓名：王慧敏申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：法律國際法指導教師：李小明20080420法律碩士學位論文AbstractWiththe∞cialandeconomicdeVelopment，lotsofmonopolyconnictsaretal(ingplaceBecauseofpracticalnecessity’Ami—monop01yPublicImerestLitigation邪anew

2、Iitigationismo他andmoregiVenattentionAnti—monopolyPubIicInterestLitigationisthesyStemthatthestateorgans，social伊0ups0rindiVidualscan10dgeacomplaintforthemonopolybehaViorswhichinfringeormayinljringeuponthenationaJintelleSts

3、∞cial卸dpub】icinterests，a棚otherspecificperSon0rO瑪aIlization’sinterestsItIlasthefollowingcharacteriStics：thepurpo∞Of1itigationisnonprofit，theformsoflitigationarediVersi壩themainprosecutionsofthelitigationareuniVersalandtheo

4、utcomeoftheIitigationissignificantpreVentiveChina’sAntimonopolyLawSection50StipulatestheestablishmemofpriVateanti—monopolylitigationmechanism，butitdo懿n’thavespecificproceduresforjudicialremediesItonlypr0Videsforadministr

5、atiVereconsiderationandadministrativelitigationrightsin∞ction53TheVictimsarelackofthegeneralprocedureforcivil觚dadministrativeprOceedings，whichwillleadtodifficuhiesinjudicialpractice，therebya肫ctingtheefrectOftheimplementa

6、tionoftheAntimonopolyLawIfChina’sAJltimonop01yPublicInte『estL“igationneedstobecarriedou【t—inreality’thefirstthingwedoisthelegislatiVeb礎hroughfromthecurrentactualproblemsandpracticesumma哆First，itistheunderstandingforthe“d

7、ireCtinterestedperson’legislatiVelyAmongthet11r∞m旬orprocedurallawsinourC0um嘎withoutexception，theydemandstheplaintifrshouldhaVedirectrightsandobligationswiththeconcreteappealCourtshaVefollowedthisgeneraJstandaurdonwhether

8、OrnottofilethecasenisVerybeneficialtestricttheabuseofappeal，tosaVethelitigationandjudicialresourc懿andtoreduCesocialcostsmediatingdisputesButiftheAmimonopolyPUbIicInterestLitigationfollowsthisprinciple，itbecomesthedirectb

9、aITiersandstumblingblockChinashouldleam疔omforeignexperienceof鋤timonopolyle舀slationtogiVetheplaintifr(1ualificationtotheprivateperson，induSt哆associations，cOnsumero唱anizationsandothersocial伊oups，thereleVamstateinstitutions

10、，剛chastheprosecutiono唱ansInadditiorItraditionalcivillawpr0Videsplaintifrmustbearthestrictburdenofproof：butinanti—monopolyJitigation，thelawshouldbemadeinfiIvoroftheplailltiffs，toapplytheprincipleofnofaultprincipleandtheon