版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、汕頭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文不動產(chǎn)相鄰關(guān)系糾紛解決機(jī)制研究:以福州市為例姓名:吳建萍申請學(xué)位級別:碩士專業(yè):行政法與行政調(diào)解方向指導(dǎo)教師:曹培2010-06II Abstract With the development of the economy, more and more easement problems appear. It is difficult to solve the easement dissension satisfa
2、ctorily, because the legislation and justice are imperfect. Harmonious easement plays an important part in the harmonious society. Hence, it is significant to research on settlement mechanism of easement dissension.
3、The author finds that current scholars study more on the levels of theory and legislation, referring a little to judicatory. Because they think it is the imperfect legislation and inoperable law that make it difficult to
4、 solve the easement dissension. Judicatory is not the only way to solve the easement dissension, especially easement styles changed rapidly with the utilizing of real property in the present economy circumstance. It is n
5、ot relied just on the legislation and judicatory to solve easement dissension, but an integrated mechanism that is basis on the mature legislation、fair judicatory、strong administrate and social mediate. Moreover, adminis
6、tration and social mediation play a great role in the settlement of easement dissension, especially in rural areas. So, we can study on the other side. To research on how to solve the easement dissension successfully, th
7、e author adopts the legal sociological research methods, literature analysis, comparative research method, demonstration and normative research methods. And study on the actuality of the settlement mechanism of easement
8、dissension through the theory analysis and demonstration to ensure a system to solve the easement dissension. Outline the whole mechanism through the theory and investigate research. It includes four levels which plays d
9、ifferent roles: substantive legal norm is the foundation; social mediation is the main means; administrative mediation is the important channel; judicatory is the ultimate protection. The author found the most vital prob
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 我國不動產(chǎn)相鄰關(guān)系規(guī)則研究.pdf
- 以不動產(chǎn)雙重買賣為視角論不動產(chǎn)登記制度.pdf
- 不動產(chǎn)稅稅率設(shè)定的實(shí)證研究——以寧波市為例.pdf
- 涉不動產(chǎn)糾紛管轄制度研究.pdf
- 離婚不動產(chǎn)糾紛法律問題研究.pdf
- 論不動產(chǎn)實(shí)物分割糾紛之裁判
- 動產(chǎn)和不動產(chǎn)的區(qū)別?不動產(chǎn)的特性?
- 我國不動產(chǎn)抵押登記問題研究——以巨野縣為例.pdf
- 不動產(chǎn)估價評價機(jī)制探究
- 現(xiàn)代城市陵園景觀研究——以福州市為例.pdf
- 不動產(chǎn)錯誤登記賠償機(jī)制研究.pdf
- 不動產(chǎn)占有人權(quán)益保護(hù)研究——以房屋多重買賣為例.pdf
- 不動產(chǎn)證券化的組織模式分析——以REITs為例.pdf
- 征地補(bǔ)償糾紛司法解決機(jī)制研究——以重慶市為例.pdf
- 城市土地集約利用評價研究——以福州市為例.pdf
- 園林標(biāo)識系統(tǒng)的構(gòu)建研究——以福州市為例.pdf
- 公務(wù)員激勵機(jī)制研究——以福州市市直機(jī)關(guān)為例.pdf
- 不動產(chǎn)信息資源共享模式研究——以珠海市為例.pdf
- 不動產(chǎn)登記糾紛民事與行政交叉問題之研究.pdf
- 不動產(chǎn)登記糾紛行政訴訟若干問題研究.pdf
評論
0/150
提交評論