版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
1、華中科技大學碩士學位論文試論孔子與亞里士多德的中庸思想及現(xiàn)代意義姓名:陶雅娟申請學位級別:碩士專業(yè):倫理學指導教師:韓東屏20070508華 中 科 技 大 學 碩 士 學 位 論 文 IIAbstract The golden mean concept, which possesses rich contents and important value, is a valuable heritage both in the Chine
2、se thought history and in the western thought history. As an old idea of knowledge in the Chinese history, the golden mean of the Confucius is not only an important category of the Confucianists but also the prime of the
3、 Chinese traditional cultures. And the Aristotle is the comprehensive expression of ancient Greek golden mean thought. In his ethics thought, golden mean is at the center, is the highest good. Golden mean is not eclectic
4、ism. He used “good”to characterize morals, whose major principle is appropriateness. It is not easy to reach. It needs constant rational pursuit. The Confucius golden mean philosophy and Aristotle’s golden mean moral phi
5、losophy as a way of conducting oneself in the world both occupied an important place in Western and Chinese history of ethic philosophy respectively. This paper reviews, analyses and compares the origin, its basic charac
6、teristics of the golden mean Concept and its development in Aristotle and Confucius. Their coming into being, their nature, their basic content and their practice bear some similarities. But they are different in the bas
7、ic way of achieving one’s moral ideals, in the view on the humans’ initiative, in the effect of practice and in the ideal society they constructed. A comparison of the two schools is helpful in understanding the relation
8、ship between the Chinese and Western philosophies. Consequentially, the Golden Mean made profound influence upon Chinese people in values, behavior mode and thinking mode. It tries to grasp the concept’s basic implicatio
9、n, show its modern value through the comparison between China and the west and give full appraisal of the view of the golden mean from the actual and present facts and its current significance. Keywords:Confucius; Aristo
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 試論孔子與亞里士多德的中庸思想及現(xiàn)代意義.pdf
- 亞里士多德與孔子中庸思想之比較
- 孔子與亞里士多德的中庸思想比較研究
- 亞里士多德與孔子中庸思想之比較.pdf
- 孔子與亞里士多德的中庸思想比較研究.pdf
- 孔子中庸思想與亞里士多德中道思想的比較研究.pdf
- 孔子與亞里士多德中庸美學思想比較研究.pdf
- 孔子中庸觀與亞里士多德中道觀比較.pdf
- 孔子與亞里士多德體育思想比較研究.pdf
- 人本中庸靈魂——亞里士多德體育思想主要之維
- 試論亞里士多德的德性觀
- 亞里士多德的教育思想
- 亞里士多德幸福思想探究
- 孔子與亞里士多德德性倫理思想比較研究.pdf
- 亞里士多德廉政思想研究
- 亞里士多德
- 亞里士多德的正義思想探析
- 亞里士多德的政治思想
- 亞里士多德的中道思想研究
- 亞里士多德羞恥思想研究
評論
0/150
提交評論