版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、湘潭大學(xué)博士學(xué)位論文現(xiàn)代新儒家對傳統(tǒng)佛學(xué)的詮釋與借鑒姓名:陳芷燁申請學(xué)位級別:博士專業(yè):中國哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:徐孫銘20080301IIA b s t r a c tContemporary Neo- Confucianists annotate traditional Buddhism and referent it, when they construct their metaphysical system,
2、traditional Buddhism becomes one crucial part of them. The study of Contemporary Neo- Confucianists begins from 3 aspects. First, they study the history of Buddhism, which construct the base for
3、 them to use and digest Buddhism in high level. Second, Contemporary Neo- Confucianists reform Chinese traditional Buddhism, then Buddhism can communicate on the same flat. At last, traditional Buddh
4、ism have great effect on the establishment of Contemporary Neo- Confucianists, whatever in content or form, and even more, its’ method help Contemporary Neo- Confucian to bring about the senses of sup
5、eriority of themselves when they deal with the connection between west and east. Traditional Buddhism can be divided into 2 parts, one is the mind- only system which bases on Alaga consciousnes
6、s, and another is Tendai school, Avatmmsaka school and Ch’an, which depend on The awakening of faith in the Mahayana et. The latter is the main current of Chinese Buddhism. Contemporary Neo- Confuci
7、an think that both of them can be useful, the former have can communicate in science, logic and Psychology, but it have more defective on Axiology and Ontology, we can only reach round thoug
8、ht in philosophy when we turn on the latter road. Contemporary Neo- Buddhist including OuyangJingwu, Lucheng, Yinshun opposite the praise of Contemporary Neo- Confucianists to traditional Buddhism. They
9、 think Tendai school, Avatmmsaka school and Ch’an, mix too many factors and thinking models of Chinese, and it goes against originally essence of India Buddhism. So there are great difference
10、between Contemporary Neo- Confucianists and M Contemporary Neo- Buddhist on study traditional Buddhism, they argue about ten times on the fundamental problem of Buddhism. These argument are mainly
11、 about XiongShili’s new theory of the Mind- only, the empty heart of suchness and the Middle Way. These arguments can efficiently help us inspect Modern Confucians’ study on traditional Buddhism
12、 in a wide view, and from these we can find out the academic and thought connotation behind the difference. We will patically, objectively praise the study of modern new Confucian on traditional Budd
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 現(xiàn)代新儒家對傳統(tǒng)佛學(xué)的詮釋與借鑒.pdf
- 福州地區(qū)現(xiàn)代建筑設(shè)計對傳統(tǒng)民居的借鑒.pdf
- 先秦儒家德治思想的現(xiàn)代詮釋.pdf
- 儒家民本思想及其現(xiàn)代詮釋、.pdf
- 傳統(tǒng)“謙”德的現(xiàn)代詮釋
- 新儒家與現(xiàn)代書院
- 住宅設(shè)計對傳統(tǒng)居住文化的借鑒.pdf
- 現(xiàn)代新儒家與中國現(xiàn)代化
- 儒家傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代性——杜維明新儒學(xué)思想研究.pdf
- 儒家生態(tài)倫理思想的現(xiàn)代詮釋.pdf
- 傳統(tǒng)“謙”德的現(xiàn)代詮釋.pdf
- 新媒體對傳統(tǒng)媒體的沖擊與互補
- 傳統(tǒng)儒家倫理與現(xiàn)代醫(yī)德建設(shè).pdf
- 現(xiàn)代新儒家的和諧思想
- 傳統(tǒng)教師德性的現(xiàn)代詮釋.pdf
- 儒家人生觀對傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)學(xué)倫理的影響
- 儒家行政倫理思想的現(xiàn)代借鑒.pdf
- 論中國當(dāng)代油畫對傳統(tǒng)木版年畫的借鑒
- 現(xiàn)代新儒家與船山學(xué).pdf
- 論周銳創(chuàng)作對傳統(tǒng)文化的借鑒與傳承.pdf
評論
0/150
提交評論