論銷售偽劣產(chǎn)品罪與詐騙罪的界限.pdf

1、⑧《《Ⅲ0I|lII《川||I|||1I||《0Y2442633分類號UDC密級公五暑哦≯產(chǎn)哮碩士研究生學位論文IJJII㈣JIIIJJJIfI川WF2811833論銷售偽劣產(chǎn)品罪與詐騙罪的界限申請人：學號：培養(yǎng)單位：學科專業(yè)：研究方向：指導教師：完成日期：張海燕3091523法學院法律碩士(在職)刑法學魏建國教授2013年10月30日黑龍江大學碩士學位論文AbstractThecrimeofmanufacturingorselling

2、counterfeitorinferiorproductsisprOduCerSandseersinVi0IatOn0ftheIaw，intheproductadulteratedimpudties，shoddyorsubstandardproductasaqualifiedproduct，thesalesamountinthebehaViorofmorethan50，000yuanFraudreferstothei11egalposs

3、essionforthepu印ose，theuseoffictitiousfactsormethodsofdeceptiontoconcealthetruth，sothattheVictimcaughttheerror，thela瑪ertheamountof丘audoVerthebehaViorofpublicaIldpriVatepropenySellingf≥敝eorsubstandardproductsinthe”impuriti

4、es，shoddy”behaviorandcrimeof仔aud”fictionalfactsandconcealthetmth”behaViorhasacenainsimilari吼Injudicialpractice，pronetoconmsionmainlythosethatsellproductsu11derthebannerofthenameoftheimplementationofthe仔audofcommodit)rtra

5、dingorforeignlanguagedressedimplementedfaudandproductionandsaleoffakepro(1uctssinsbound撕esInthiscase，thetwocrimeinbehaVioralcharacteristicsexhibited伊eatsimil撕哆todeteTllflinethenatureofthecrimeincreasedenornlouslydi銜cult，

6、oRenresultingindifrerentco—contractingsituation，therefore，distinguishbe觚eenthe觚ocrimeswhichconstituteelementsaswellasthelimitsofjudicialpracticeisextremelynecessa巧Thisanicle舶mthe坩oelementsofthecrimeandjudicialpracticeofa

7、comparatiVeanalysisof帆oangles，行omthepointofView咐oconstitllentelementsofcriminalintentcrime，Violationoftheobject，thesubjectofcrimeandobjectiVeaspectsaredifferentInjudicialpractice，thecorrectdistinctionbe觚eentwoactsofcrime

8、ismainlytoseeiftherearepeopleinthesubjectiVeintentoftherealdeal，theobjectiVeistodeliVerthesubjectmatteraswellasthesubjectmatterisValuableThisarticlecorrectlydistinguishtwosinsputfbnⅣardtheirownideas，hopingtobehelp如lforin