高校課堂教學(xué)質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)現(xiàn)狀研究.pdf

1、西南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文高校課堂教學(xué)質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)現(xiàn)狀研究姓名：安敏申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：高等教育學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：趙伶俐20081101西南人學(xué)碩I‘學(xué)位論文AbstractAtpresent，evaluationofclassroomteachingqualityisawayofevaluatingteacher’Swork，evaluationisthemainpurpose，howevertheeffectsofevaluation，such

2、asfeedbackandpromotion，arenotobviousDesignofcriterionisnotconsideredcarefully，dataprocessingisnotreasonable，andthereisnoevaluationaboutevaluationAlthoughChineseacademiapaysmuchaUentionaboutresearchofclassroomteachingqual

3、ityevaluation，therearestilllacksofin—depthstudiesThispaperusingstratifiedrandomsamplingmethod，collected84universities’classroomteachingqualityratingscalesandrelatedfilesthroughtheintemet，andcalculatedfrequencyofeachsamei

4、tem，thenwediscusswhethertheitemsarereasonableandeffectivetoevaluateclassroomteachingqualitythroughaspectssuchasevaluation’Ssubject，object，criterion(items)，dataprocessingandelementevaluationweneedbasictheoryofeducation，ps

5、ychologyeducationalpsychologyinstruction，psychologyofstudyinthisprocessofanalyzingWeexpecttofindoutreasonableandeffectiveitems，analyzecharacteristicsoftheseitemsThiscouldhelpUSimproveoarworkofdesigningmorereasonableandef

6、fectiveitemsThepaperconcludedasfollows：1WhoevaluateStudentevaluationshouldbeconsideredprimarilyandotherpeopleshouldbeinvolvedForinstance，teachersareevaluated，butteachersalsohavefightstoevaluateParentsandsocietybehindstud

7、entsshouldbeinvolvedtoo2EvaluatewhoFirstlyteachersarethemainobjectstobeevaluated，andstudentsalsoshouldbeinvolved，butstudents’performanceisnottheonlyt11iI唱t0beevaluated，wecan’tforgetteachers’performanceisthekeyfactorthata

8、ffectsclassroomteachingqualitySecondlyadministrationsrelatedtoteachingquali妙shouldbeinvolvedThirdlyhardwareshouldn’tbeconsidered3EvaluatewhatAbstractitemssuchasprincipal，diathesis，teachingartsandSOfortharelesseffectiveto