[雙語翻譯]兒童家具外文翻譯--人機工程學對兒童家具情感可持續(xù)性的貢獻（英文）

1、2351-9789 © 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of AHFE Conference doi:

2、 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.931 Procedia Manufacturing 3 ( 2015 ) 6483 – 6489 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) a

3、nd the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015Contributions of Ergonomics to an Affective Sustainability in Children’s FurnitureCristina Salvador*Centro de Investigação em Arquitectura, Urbanismo e Design, Faculdad

4、e de Arquitectura da Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Sá Nogueira, Pólo Universitário, Alto da Ajuda, 1349-055 Lisboa, PortugalAbstractWithin the context of an investigation in product design, focusing on chil

5、dren’s furniture (high chairs), a research was made, dealing with issues as affective sustainability, leading to waste reduction and product optimization. The child is a special target, since the need of affection and

6、support and the potential intensity of emotional bonds are highly present in this early stage of human development. Along with literary review, the use of Ergonomics and Human Factors as a tool, in order to observe and

7、 analyze children’s behavior towards specific types of furniture through an interview based study, may contribute to a bigger understanding of what enables an emotionalconnection between subject and object and what are

8、 their parents’ choices based on. Ergonomics may be an essential key to this understanding, as it helps unravel how humans interact with their surroundings in a full extent, both physically and psychologically. Conclus

9、ions may not resultin a magic formula in order to create super objects, which every children would want and love, but atleast gives a better understanding on how sensitive and subjective child’s attachment to objects ca

10、n be and how decisive can Ergonomics be in the research process for a design project. © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Peer-review under responsibility of AHFE Conference.Keywords:Ergonomics and Human

11、Factors; Product Design; Children’s Furniture; Affective Sustainability.* Corresponding author. Tel.: +351 21 3615000; fax: +351 21 3615001. E-mail address: cristinasalvador@fa.ulisboa.pt© 2015 Published by Elsevier

12、 B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of AHFE Conference6485Cristina Salvador / Procedia Manufacturing

13、 3 ( 2015 ) 6483 – 6489 Table 1. Interview questions.A. Children’s chair01. Do you have one or more children’s high chairs? 02. What are the brand, model and color? 03. The acquisition was on 1st or 2nd hand? 04. W

14、hat were the features that influenced your choice? 05. Did the chair require special maintenance? 06. Can you describe technical or other problems that have been identified? 07. How would you describe its performance in

15、terms of endurance and efficiency?B. Adaptation08. The child received the chair at what age? 09. How old is the child? 10. Did the child experience the chair before the acquisition? 11. What was her/his first reaction? 1

16、2. How was the adaptation? 13. Were there any falls, instability or misuse by the child? 14. Does the child identify the chair as her/his own? 15. Does she/he seems to have created emotional ties with the object? 16. D

17、oes she/he complain when somebody tries to sit on the chair? 17. Did she/he try to customize the chair with drawings or stickers?C. Use18. The chair is used for what kind of activities? 19. How long will the child be s

18、eated during one of these activities? 20. Does she/he need security systems? 21. Does the child manage to sit alone? 22. Does she/he have to be forced to sit? 23. Is the child comfortable or complains she/he wants to ge

19、t out? 24. Does the child fall asleep on the chair? 25. Is it easy to clean on a daily basis?D. Conclusion26. Based on the chair’s performance, would you recommend it? 27. In case it is an evolutive chair (that follows c

20、hild’s growth), do you intend to keep it? 28. In case it is not an evolutive chair, after the child is 2-3 years old, do you intend to replace it by a chair for adults? 29. Do you have any further comments about the chai

21、r?2.2. Results Results of the interviews are summarized in 4 tables: Table 2 with results about the parent’s choice and acquisition, problems identified and appreciation in terms of efficiency; Table 3 with results abou

22、t the children’s emotional response to the product; Table 4 with the results about the children’s use of the product; Table 5 with results about parents’ satisfaction and intentions for the product’s future. The sample

23、 of 26 high chairs for children was evenly divided between two types of chairs – the chairs that can follow child’s growth until adulthood and the ones that can’t. Tripp Trapp? chair from Stokke?, designed by Peter Ops

24、vik, whose work deserved further research in previous studies by the author[12], represents 50% of the sample. Polly chair from Chicco? represents 38,5% and Antilop chair from IKEA? represents the remaining 11,5% of the

25、 sample. The acquisition is mostly in 1st hand and the features or factors that influenced the choice are variable. Parents who choose Tripp Trapp? chairs are more concerned with durability, classic timeless design, qu